Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
Hunter-gatherers typically experienced greater freedom and autonomy, greater height and health, and probably lived a better life than early urban humans.

The ones who died of Type I diabetes, or from an infected cut on their toe, or appendicitis, or other easily treatable conditions, probably didn't. I do know that anyone in a modern society today is free to live a hunter-gatherer lifestyle if he is so inclined, but that few do.

96 posted on 05/29/2008 4:49:45 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: untenured
Notice I said “early urban humans”. They were just as susceptible, if not more so, because they had “doctors” who would operate with infected equipment, and “hospitals” to spread diseases.

And do you suppose that these hunter gatherers are healthier and happier than people living in the slums of Rio de Jinero? Because that is their choice if they “join society” in their region. Freedom and a healthy happy life in the jungle, or poverty and disease in the slums with an open sewer running beside your shack.

The majority of urban dwellers on earth, even today, do not live like “modern society”; they live in much worse conditions than those eking a life out of the rain-forest.

99 posted on 05/29/2008 4:56:47 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson