Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
What I am against is the idea that these people are miserable without us and need us to teach them how to live, or that their life is somehow worse than what they could expect as “el Indio” in the slums of any Hispanic metropolis.

What I am against any assumption that they are not capable of thinking it through for themselves. They might like (as some Brazilian Indians do) to stay, and they might like to leave. I would reject any argument (which I'm not sure you're making) that we should avoid contact for their own good. There is much bad in the slums of Lima, but there is much bad where they are too.

Modernity is no guarantee of anything, but it gives you possibilities the jungle doesn't, and the jungle at least is there as a fallback. Leaving them as untouched zoo animals, it seems to me, shows them no moral respect.

105 posted on 05/29/2008 6:44:55 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: untenured
I agree that they shouldn't be deliberately kept in the Jungle as some sort of exhibit of feral humanity. If they have been out of contact this long it is probably intentional. I am sure they know that they are surrounded by other people, I am not sure they want them to know where they are.
110 posted on 05/29/2008 7:15:25 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson