[IrishCatholic]

To take a book and suddenly edit it to tell another story calls into question the books validity.

It completely calls into question the motives of the author to change completely the tone of the book.

The fact the Republican author has his book edited by people connected with the Nation magazine and published by a company owned by George Soros does call into question the validity.

“Apparently it does.” To who? Someone who would believe anything negative about Bush without even questioning it?

If you can't see this no one can help you.

[Huck]

To take a book and suddenly edit it to tell another story calls into question the books validity.

All books have editors. There is no evidence of anything nefarious. So Scott's out hawking a book he disagrees with? Where did he say that?