Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dawnsblood
In explaining his opposition to the Alito nomination, Mr. Obama said that Judge Alito’s record showed “extraordinarily consistent support for the powerful against the powerless” and “for an overreaching federal government against individual rights and liberties.”

The first is not a Constitutional concern, per se. Only the second is. Either Sen Obama is as ignorant of the Constitution and interpretative rulings as he is of his own family history, or he is in favor of legislating from the Bench. Neither is good.

4 posted on 05/28/2008 1:32:41 PM PDT by surely_you_jest (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: surely_you_jest

“for an overreaching federal government against individual rights and liberties.”

Since when did that matter to a liberal?

As far as I know, only when the government is trying to stop evil.


5 posted on 05/28/2008 1:35:02 PM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson