[stravinskyrules]

These rumors are being fed intentionally to foreign media service by the DoD commands....

I m positive Bush will not be passing a less than nuke neutered Iran to his successor.

[itsahoot]

I m positive Bush will not be passing a less than nuke neutered Iran to his successor.

Not in our lifetime. I hope you are not giving odds. Baring any direct attack on the U. S. or Israel, we will do nothing.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

" I'm positive Bush will not be passing a less than nuke neutered Iran to his successor. "

Even if it were a very reliable conservative President who were to take office next January, I think it has more to do with who we got as " choices " and who might win the election next November than kicking the can down the road and leave this mess for someone else that President Bush taking action against Iran AND ? that we are running out of time to deal with Iran before they produce a working nuke and missile to hit Israel with it.

[hinckley buzzard]

I am positive Bush will not be passing a less than nuke neutered Iran to his successor.

Guess again. Bush has had it, and is content to run out the clock.

[Non-Sequitur]

I m positive Bush will not be passing a less than nuke neutered Iran to his successor.

And how will he accomplish that? Airstrikes? What that will leave is a pissed off and maybe nuke neutered Iran to his successor. We couldn't neutralize Saddam with airstrikes alone. We chouldn't drive al Qaida and the Taliban out of Afganistan with airstrikes alone. We can't guarantee a nuke-free Iran with airstrikes alone. It will take troops on the ground to do that, and we're fresh out.