It's moot, as honor is seldom valued, carries a disincentive in most cases, and is even celebrated by liberals.. In the decaying American, it has become the cultural norm in all but the most singular form. You neglect to realize this at your own peril.
This, in part, explains why these conflicts are often decided in the courts, the new social arbitrers of morality (see California Homosexual Marriage (sic)). JPM and the plaintiff actually prefer to have it in the courts: Both parties would not favor well against a educated, moral citizenry nor omnipotent God. This was the judge and jury of yesteryear America, and unfortunately, liberals have been quite effective in snuffing them both to only a volatile remnant.
>>It’s moot, as honor is seldom valued
What is honor but simply following your conscience; and how did it come to this, that so many would so willingly dispose of the only thing they can truly call their own?
It seems to me that it is prerequisite for liberty; and that without it one is no longer an individual, endowed with inalienable rights - but rather reduced to being a part of a collective hive; with no more reason to exist than to worship, serve, and be disposed of by the very thing that enslaves them.