Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
It's my understanding that it is the job of the Solicitor General to argue vigorously before the US Supreme Court that every single bill passed by Congress and signed into law by the President is entirely Constitutional.

That includes bills passed by an earlier Congress and signed into law by previous administrations.

Sounds like a rotten job, actually. I could never be a lawyer forced to take a position that I was fundamentally opposed to.

244 posted on 06/01/2008 9:53:31 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid
It's my understanding that it is the job of the Solicitor General to argue vigorously before the US Supreme Court that every single bill passed by Congress and signed into law by the President is entirely Constitutional.

I had wondered whether that was the case. You're right, it would seem to be peculiar in a lot of circumstances. Can you see Abraham Lincoln's Solicitor General standing up and arguing the cogency of the Fugitive Slave Act to the Supreme Court, with Roger Taney sitting up there on the bench? It would be very odd.

246 posted on 06/03/2008 4:52:06 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson