Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring

Well. His whole issue was little more than “don’t legalize machineguns”.

Please, oh please, eliminate 922(o)...


214 posted on 05/29/2008 5:59:16 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
Presuming Heller goes our way, I can see a case making it to SCOTUS in several years that might reopen the NFA to new transferables in states that permit ownership. I think that case would be born by a challenge to any new ban by Congress like the '94 Crime Bill.

What needs to happen is that SCOTUS' ruling destroys the 'Sporting Purpose' language in the 1968 GCA. If the ruling goes our way, that one will be the first to fall. There is no way 'Sporting Purposes' can be defended by the Federal government if SCOTUS rules we have an individual right to keep and bear arms both separate and in concert with the militia.

Congress would have to amend the US Constitution to remove the Militia Clause to head us off at the pass.

251 posted on 06/03/2008 11:06:55 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson