Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faloi
"I appreciate the "states rights" viewpoint in allowing the citizens to decide the issue, but the US Constitution is the trump card, as I understand law."

You are correct.

But the courts have ruled that the second amendment only applies to federal laws, not state laws. If Mr. Heller resided in Chicago and claimed second amendment protection, the courts would have thrown it out.

Since he is a Washington, DC resident, however, we are talking about federal law and the second amendment.

"The chief difference is that "the right to bear arms" is specifically in the Constitution."

Yes, and so is the right to free speech. Yet some speech is federally regulated even though the first amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law ...". The question to the court is if some weapons can be regulated.

154 posted on 05/28/2008 7:16:58 AM PDT by vincentfreeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: vincentfreeman
But the courts have ruled that the second amendment only applies to federal laws, not state laws. If Mr. Heller resided in Chicago and claimed second amendment protection, the courts would have thrown it out.

How's it going Robert? Changing your screen name doesn't hide your stripes.

159 posted on 05/28/2008 8:03:31 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson