[Delacon]

“FYI-—I am a AGW skeptic to the core. I believe most of the recent warming is due to the Sun and not human produced CO2. But I think this article has been debunked elsewhere on the WEB . Please don;t let AGW propaganda and misinforamation fool you by trying to get you to go crazy over jibberish.”

I leaped before I looked. I’ve now looked. Its actually hard to find any debunking of Herr Loebert but thats because he has only been posting for about the last 3 months. He is all over the climate change blogs posting the same stuff that is listed in the article I posted. He is a busy bee and I am now pretty certain a loon. My apologies to everyone. My only excuse its that I fell for the fact that his “findings” have been sited on several well known blogs and that I’ve am a bit loggy from the holiday weekend.

[Enchante]

"the CO2 concentration has been increasing exponentially since the 1950’s"

I am not a scientist and claim no expertise at all, but this statement makes me think this guy has no idea what he's talking about. All accounts I have seen use figures in the range of 280 ppm (by volume) for CO2 in the atmosphere for 50+ years ago and around 380 ppm recently. Whatever else that is, it is not an "exponential" increase (a term that is much misused and abused to mean any kind of significant increase). I do not trust this guy at all.

fwiw, I am skeptical about AGW or at least the extent of it claimed, but I am extra-skeptical of myself since I know I cannot evaluate all the data and arguments. I simply don't trust dishonest pompous gasbags like Al Gore.

[InABunkerUnderSF]

He sounds rational until you get beyond his bullet points. Then it looks a lot like his real agenda is can be summed up as “Heisenberg good, Einstein bad” and all that entails.