Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harkin Attacks McCain for Having Served In the Military Too Much
abcnews.com ^ | May 26th, 2008 | Jake Tapper

Posted on 05/26/2008 3:56:05 PM PDT by The_Republican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Our Democrat Freinds wishing every Soldier well on Memorial Day!
1 posted on 05/26/2008 3:56:05 PM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

I’ll take a career military man, regardless of branch, over any civy (myself included), any day. Dismissed.


2 posted on 05/26/2008 3:58:24 PM PDT by TheZMan (Bitter backwoods east Texan Christian gun clinger with the AC at 72 degrees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

3 posted on 05/26/2008 3:58:36 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

And he says this on Memorial Day?


4 posted on 05/26/2008 3:58:37 PM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF ("Gun Control" is not about the guns. "Illegal Immigration" is not about the immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Tom Harkin: is living prove that ALL are not created with equal BRAINS:-()

Photobucket

5 posted on 05/26/2008 3:59:58 PM PDT by geo40xyz (McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Woe! Look at the heroic admiration in all of their eyes........


6 posted on 05/26/2008 4:01:08 PM PDT by The_Republican (Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
He's running for commander in chief, and our Constitution says that should be a civilian.

point one; McCain IS a civilian, Point two; The constitution says no such thing.
7 posted on 05/26/2008 4:02:01 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
You're right.

Title change: "Harkin Attacks McCain for Having Served In the US Military Too Much"

There, fixed, it.

8 posted on 05/26/2008 4:03:01 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Harkin’s such a...what’s the word? PUTZ?? Yeah, fits just right...he’s a PUTZ!


9 posted on 05/26/2008 4:03:45 PM PDT by GRRRRR (2008- A Year That Will Live in Infamy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Jake Tapper surprises me more all the time. I wonder if he’s having an ideological conversion.


10 posted on 05/26/2008 4:03:47 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Shut up, REMF......


11 posted on 05/26/2008 4:04:02 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Harkin and the woman look like they are at a Toga Party.


12 posted on 05/26/2008 4:04:09 PM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

“He’s running for commander in chief, and our Constitution says that should be a civilian.”

Harkin and his fellow travlers don’t know a thing about what the Constitution says. To them it’s just so much toilet paper.


13 posted on 05/26/2008 4:05:22 PM PDT by Be_Politically_Erect (If I didn't think he'd get emotionally attached to it, I'd tell Barry to kiss my A**!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

US SEN Tom Harkin (SCUMBAG-IA) = coward, lowlife, dirtbag, garbage, trash, lib-dem filth, junk, crap, traitor, seditionist, saboteur, leftist, commie, socialist, hate-America, sodomy-supporter, homo-enabler, punk, etc.

IMO.


14 posted on 05/26/2008 4:05:58 PM PDT by do not press 2 for spanish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Weren’t they harpin about GW not being in the military enough?? Guess you have to be in just right.

Pray for W and Our Troops


15 posted on 05/26/2008 4:05:58 PM PDT by bray (If everyone hates you, you must be doin something right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"I think he's trapped in that. Everything is looked at from his life experiences, from always having been in the military, and I think that can be pretty dangerous."

Same crap could be said for buffoons like Harkin spending all of their life as a politician in Washington. NOW THAT'S DANGEROUS! Throw the bums out!

16 posted on 05/26/2008 4:06:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
I can only imagine the opposition that the dems "serving" today would have against General George Washington as President of the United States...

I'm sure Harkin would contend that Washington spent too much time in the military, and I'm sure that Rockefeller would complain that unlike McCain, who dropped bombs from the air, Washington actually killed men in hand to hand combat, making him completely inappropriate as President.

The more the dems talk, the more disgusted I get.

Mark

17 posted on 05/26/2008 4:08:21 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"He's running for commander in chief, and our Constitution says that should be a civilian."

McCain's been a civilian for about 35 years, Tommy.

The Rats attack GOP nominees for not serving enough, for serving too much, and for actually killing the enemy while serving.

Yet draft dodging Democrat nominees are revered.

18 posted on 05/26/2008 4:09:36 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

This coming from the man who lied about serving in Vietnam?


19 posted on 05/26/2008 4:10:16 PM PDT by Hoodat (Bull Moose Party Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"Harkin, like McCain, was a Navy flier, though unlike McCain Harkin never saw combat."


Yes, and many of us may remember that Harkin is one of the "Stolen Valor" types of fraud-politicians who concocted a fictitious combat career to puff himself up. To serve is noble, to fraudulently give oneself combat experience that never happened is ignoble and contemptible. Period.

===========================================

Candidate Harkin Stretches the Truth

Vietnam isn't the only instance.

BY JAMES M. PERRY

"... the Iowa lawmaker has found himself accused of misleading reporters about the troubles of his deaf brother. In addition, the budgetary mathematics he weaves into his basic stump speech have been challenged on network television. And allegations about Mr. Harkin's truthfulness extend back well before the current campaign, back to his claims that he was a combat pilot in Vietnam....

...In Mr. Harkin's case, the questions that have lingered longest concern his Navy record. Mr. Harkin did serve in the Navy during the Vietnam era, but exactly what he did, and for how long, remain a matter of some dispute...."

Other issues covered in the article:

...Harkin claimed he flew combat air patrols over Vietnam. It turns out it was over Cuba...

...Harkin claimed he spent "eight years, eight months and eight days as a Navy pilot." His military record shows he served five years on active duty...

...Harkin claimed he spent a year in Vietnam, but he was really stationed in Japan...
...Harkin referred to himself as a "Vietnam veteran in Congress" but is actually only a "Vietnam-era veteran" and has never received the standard Vietnam Service medal or Vietnam Campaign medal which were given to all who served in the Southeast Asia theater.

...Harkin lied about his deaf brother's employment history...
20 posted on 05/26/2008 4:10:53 PM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson