Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darren McCarty
Those Law Review articles and academia can surprisingly influential (for good or bad) with a number of courts.

If you haven't read Scalia's opinion, it appears that you were prophetic.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., PETITIONERS v. DICK ANTHONY HELLER

We dodged a bullet - BIG TIME!

22 posted on 06/26/2008 7:00:55 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Not really prophetic. I've just read enough con law cases in my lifetime to see that. Also considering the lack of strong precident on this, it was ripe to look at everything. Irony is that I was reading instapundit and volokh conspiracy this morning, and both of those profs I believe were cited. Kates and Barnett as well. Those are four of the most prominent scholars on this issue for the pro side. And Volokh congratulated Brian Frye....the same article you sent me was cited by Scalia.

The lesson as Volokh says - Scholarship matters. Good law reviews and research can influence some of the biggest decisions of this land.

23 posted on 06/26/2008 8:21:37 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson