Sure, let’s “dump McCain” to improve Barack Hussein Obama’s chances to become president to 99%, and have him carry all 50 states, getting 80% of the popular vote.
What a brilliant idea — if you want Obama to be president, that is.
McCain got the delegates fair and square, because there was no electable conservative running. Why aren’t you blaming the conservatives who couldn’t manage to come up with a candidate who could win the Republican nomination and has a shot at the general election?
At this point attacking McCain and going as far as advocating that the Republican Party “dump him” ONLY serves to improve Obama’s chances to get elected. Maybe that is the group’s REAL agenda.
Another MugWhore heard from.
Not happy about McCain but at least he has a clue who the enemy is and his son has done a tour in Iraq with the 1st Marine Div.
Those who don’t like McCain or Hunter who are both Viet Nam war vets and both have Marine sons who have served
in Iraq are the type who ease their conscious hating
those who have served while they didn’t .
If we don’t win the war, it make no difference who votes what on economic issues.
They don’t make pockets in shrouds.
With the traitorous bastard as the Republican nominee, the Democrats could nominate a ham sandwich and win. It's a foregone conclusion.
At this point attacking McCain and going as far as advocating that the Republican Party “dump him” ONLY serves to improve Obama’s chances to get elected.
There is no way (nor need) to improve the Dem nominee's chance of election as long as the Pubbie nominee is a back-stabbing RINO.
Securing a 'mulligan' at the convention only serves to provide a slim chance of winning.