Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Phone Man

No Hillary fan, however let’s be fair. The statement sure makes a good sound bite. Yet the context in which it was delivered surrounds a question regarding why she was still in the race. She pointed out that the dems were still trying to determine the Nominee as late as June 92 as well as in 68. The reference to RFK was to jog memories that indeed he was still running as a candidate in June 68 and not the nominee. It was a point of reference only. No doubt poorly worded considering the political climate. Let her own party destroy her over this. They don’t need out help.


5 posted on 05/25/2008 3:36:00 PM PDT by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: topfile
A point of reference?

She's studied law. She knew exactly what she was saying and to what purpose. This was no mere "slip of the tongue" or attempt to "jog memories". And it was the way she brought it up. And left it all hanging.

Now she wants to play as The Bad Seed, declaring she has no idea whatever happened to the missing tap shoe?

9 posted on 05/25/2008 3:42:46 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: topfile
Most nuclear bomb components are classified as having an industrial dual-use, allowing for plausible deniability. Regardless of the context pf when past nominating races lasted into the summer, the reason this one is continuing is that the loser is hoping for something to trip up the leader.

-PJ

25 posted on 05/25/2008 5:19:59 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson