Posted on 05/25/2008 3:26:56 PM PDT by Old Phone Man
"Makes issue of state's name, too racist."
"Alabama" offends Obama. "Too much like Obama."
"The other 57 states' names are probably okay."
It just shows that she’s creepy; RFK was the only person to take the fight to June. And even if he did, what did his assasination have to do with his contesting the CA primary?
But he's gambling: the emotions he's stirring up oscillate in both directions. He came out of nowhere overnight and he can go back there just as fast.
But his machinery is very, very effective. Still, I think FR can be at least as effective.
I wish someone would keep posting that "Bamboozling" video compilation, that juxtaposes the Oman with all the previous people who's lines he's ripping off. It's chilling.
-PJ
Do they teach to use words "I" and "you know" in just about every sentence in law school?
No wonder The Beast appeals to undereducated white "working class".
Right ..............
THE OBAMA FILE - LATEST NEWS:
Debbie Schussel wants to know why Barack Obama claims he's against HAMAS and Hezbollah, but is meeting with one of Hezbollah's most important imams and agents in America, Imam Hassan Qazwini?
And wants to know why is this open anti-Semite and supporter of Israel's annihilation getting to discuss "the Arab-Israeli conflict" in a private, one-on-one meeting with Obama? What was said? I think we can do the math.
Qazwini is an agent of the Iranian government, spreading its propaganda. He was sent to the U.S. by Iran to help radicalize his mosque, the Islamic Center of America, which -- at the time -- was becoming moderate with women not covering their hair and mixing with men. All that has changed, under Qazwini.
Qazwini is very open about his support for Palestinian homicide bombings, HAMAS, and Hezbollah, and he's a good friend of Hezbollah spiritual leader, Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah -- the man who issued the fatwa to Hezbollah terrorists to murder over 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy civilians in cold blood. Qazwini's mosque has held rallies and celebrations in support of Hezbollah, and many of Hezbollah's biggest money-launderers and agents in America are his congregants.
More . . .
OK so your in the Chris Mattews camp on this one and
I’m defending Hillary. Suddenly I feel the need to take a bath.
Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton called Clinton’s remarks “ominous” and “completely inappropriate.” “We will not be intimidated by Senator Clinton’s thinly-veiled threats,” Burton proclaimed. “We will say, though, that these remarks provide further support for the Senator’s deterimination to limit access to guns by persons who are demonstrably unstable or mentally unbalanced.”
Senator Clinton denied making any threat, “thinly-veiled or otherwise.” She went on to characterize her remarks as “hypothetical,” and “just a bit of friendly advice.”
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
Hillary Clinton is either stupid or naive enough to believe that her reference to the RFK assassination would not mean something “completely unthinkable”. It is obvious that her intellect is highly overrated.
Hillary says nothing that is not on the script.
-PJ
Maybe she just misspoke. She can’t recall tho.
I watched the whole long and dull interview, the money quote not yet having been extracted and YouTubed. It was mostly tedious policy wonkery about ethanol and Indian reservations and such. Towards the end, the editors asked her why she was staying in the race. The assassination reference was merely a note in the context of a standard-issue Clinton deception, namely that the fact that Bobby was still running when he was murdered in June meant that campaigns lasting into June is normal (and a justification for her continuing on). The deception lies in the fact that forty years ago the campaign season got a much later start. The editors didn't call her on her distortion of history. Nor did they react perceptibly to her use of the a-word.
So, intentional? I think not. She's plenty smart enough to know use of the assassination word in the Obama context would be a gaffe.
No, this was a classic thoughtless Freudian slip. She carelessly gave us a glimpse of what's in her head. Assassination is the one sure thing on the ever shorter list of ways she can still win it. She just let it out because it happened to be germane to the historical event she was deceptively adducing.
True if some Muslim madman sniper with a rifle were still running free - due to the stupid black racist Montgomery County Police Chief Moose -- who was STILL looking for WHITE men in a WHITE van...
.Check out this awesome video:
.
The same kind of terrorists who support Obama did this:
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/attack/
Never apologize for them.
Never appease them.
Never forget.
.
The deception lies in the fact that forty years ago the campaign season got a much later start. The editors didn't call her on her distortion of history. Nor did they react perceptibly to her use of the a-word.
You've made my point here. Referencing RFK's (and BClinton's) campaigning as yet in CA in June would have been sufficient to make the point. If she had left her comments right at that point, it is possible others might have brought up your fact -- that campaign seasons got a much later start, then.
I've read elsewhere her recent assertion that she had Ted Kennedy's ailment on her mind which is what sparked (as a cause) for her JFK "assassination" sentence (which immediately followed the "campaign in June" issue) in addendum.
So, intentional? I think not. She's plenty smart enough to know use of the assassination word in the Obama context would be a gaffe.
If she is plenty smart enough to know use of the assassination word in the Obama context would be a gaffe, then perhaps indeed she was being utterly senseless in bringing up "assassination" in re June campaigning.
No, this was a classic thoughtless Freudian slip. She carelessly gave us a glimpse of what's in her head. Assassination is the one sure thing on the ever shorter list of ways she can still win it. She just let it out because it happened to be germane to the historical event she was deceptively adducing.
I concede to this point you make, and well. I have never asserted she "gaffe'd". Thoughtless Freudian slip might cover the matter. Looks like that's how she's currently spinning it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.