[count-your-change]

The question is not so much whether Darwin would have approved but on what basis he would have disapproved.
Law? Morality? Economics? Darwin certainly would’ve considered Hitler a monster but he could hardly argue with his goals.

[SeekAndFind]

The question is not so much whether Darwin would have approved but on what basis he would have disapproved.

Excellent point. All Darwin could really say logically is "I personally disapprove". But that disapproval is simply my own "evolutionary" make-up impelling me to think this way.

Hitler could just as much say that his evolutionary make-up is different from Darwin's and his actions are simply the result of Darwinian selection.