Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Wrong bomb' row over MoD payouts
Guardian.co.uk ^ | 5/25/08 | Mark Townsend

Posted on 05/24/2008 8:11:52 PM PDT by Dawnsblood

British soldiers seriously injured in Iraq and Afghanistan are being denied government compensation because they were wounded by the 'wrong type of bomb'. The Ministry of Defence has refused payouts for injuries under its criminal injuries scheme that may have been caused by landmines left by the Soviet army in Afghanistan or other discarded ordnance.

Under the MoD's criminal injuries compensation overseas scheme, frontline troops can claim for an injury or death not caused by military operations against the Taliban or Iraqi militia.

Alternatively, troops injured after April 2005 can also apply for financial support under the armed forces compensation scheme, which offers payouts for soldiers injured or killed on duty.

However, troops rejected from the criminal injuries scheme are no longer eligible for the other scheme, with soldiers' lawyers claiming that a number of injured frontline troops are being denied their rightful compensation.

Manchester-based Hilary Meredith Solicitors, which has more than 20 years experience in pursuing claims against the military, said: 'The government's logic is bizarre and they are clearly wriggling out of paying men injured in war zones by suggesting they have been injured by the wrong type of bomb.'

Recently the government increased the maximum payout under its armed forces compensation scheme to £285,000. Payments under the criminal injuries scheme are higher with a maximum of up to £500,000.

Lawyers representing British troops believe that Soviet landmines and discarded explosives should be classified as causing criminal injuries as they were not deployed against British forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; iraq; ministryofdefence; soviets
Sounds to me like injuries in a warzone should be treated the same but I will admit that I am no British legal expert.
1 posted on 05/24/2008 8:11:53 PM PDT by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
Oh...that's so sad. My goodness, they've sacrificed so much. If true, this is so wrong.

YET ANOTHER REASON GOVERNMENTS SHOULDN'T RUN HEALTHCARE.

2 posted on 05/24/2008 8:18:20 PM PDT by NordP ((Rev Wright ) - Hey, Obama... Looks like YOUR "turrr-key" has come hoooome to ROOOOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

I am utterly appalled. Just when I think things can’t get any worse in Britain, something like this shows up.


3 posted on 05/25/2008 1:30:25 AM PDT by Ronin (Is there some PC rule on FR that says that when an evil man gets sick, we must pretend he was saint?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson