Replies

Is this W-P employee considered a "reporter" or a columnist?

A "reporter" passes judgment on the plausibility of a story's details?

.. and (I'm old) that cute little CP/USA 1950s trick of changing the name of a House Committee on Un-American Activities to "[House] Un-American Activities committee" (HUAC). Wouldn't it have been (and still is) more correct to simply use HCUAA, kew-ah instead of who-act?

.. and the usual (sob, sob) our John Kerry was a victim of swift boating's "absurd to the merely questionable" accusations. The employee left out that it's been revealed that Kerry served in Viet Nam. The employee is probably self-shielded from the public challenge to Kerry to prove he was "swift-boated."

Kerry could collect at least a million dollars to prove he was a victim of swift boating -- maybe he's not interested in the money because there's no woman attached.

On the whole I give the employee an A++ for making it absolutely clear WHY WE NEED A TRULY FREE PRESS TO COUNTER THE MSM. Thank you, Mr. Milbank!

Well, there is indeed very good reason to doubt his “loyalty to the United States.” If one reads “Dreams from My Father”, ponders that for 20 years he thought Wright's paranoid anti-US ravings unremarkable, recall that he launched his political career at the feet of an unrepentant America-hating terrorist, remember that he married a woman who thinks this is a “mean” country of which she can only now be tentatively “proud” because it might put her sour, angry persona in the White House, and knows he said we have to eat and drive less because foreigners would like us to, what other conclusion could we reach?

When I see an article by Dana Milbank, I normally don’t read it period as I know it will be Left-biased-BS. I usually just read the comments of my bretheren at FR for the humor.

Might as well read Dowd, or Helen Thomas as to read Milbank.