Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hearing includes photos of Warren Jeffs kissing 13-year-old
Go San Angelo ^ | 5/23/08 | Paul A. Anthony

Posted on 05/24/2008 6:09:05 AM PDT by Flo Nightengale

The San Angelo judge accused of abusing her discretion by a higher court fought back on Friday, overruling objections that cited the appellate decision during a lengthy and contentious child-custody hearing that will continue next week.

51st District Judge Barbara Walther indirectly rejected assertions by the Third Court of Appeals that she should not have allowed the state to maintain custody of more than 450 children belonging to members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Attorneys for the state's Child Protective Services agency and an attorney for the infant in Friday's hearing did the same.

"I tried to narrow the scope and keep things moving along (in April), and the complaint was I didn't let enough evidence in," Walther said of the en masse custody hearing in which she granted the state temporary custody of the children. "We're going to have a full-blown adversarial hearing. If it takes two or three days, so be it."

The comments came amid testimony and evidence that raised eyebrows in the small courtroom and will continue to be when testimony resumes Tuesday morning. Most shocking was the state's release of a picture from summer 2007 showing imprisoned sect leader Warren Jeffs, now 52, deeply kissing a then-12-year-old girl, the aunt of the infant born May 12 whose custody was the subject of the hearing.

Rulon Daniel Jessop, the girl's brother and the infant's father, said he sees nothing wrong with his children being in the same house with underage "sister wives" of much older men. "It seemed a little wild to me," Jessop testified, "but you see a lot more wild things driving down the streets of the city at night. I do not consider a girl kissing a man sexual abuse."

Jessop identified the girl, who is listed in FLDS bishop's records as being born July 3, 1994, and is shown in pictures dated July 27, 2006, as his sister.

Jessop's attorney, Pat Matassarin, dismissed the photos.

"For one thing, the guy who did it is in jail," she said, referring to Jeffs and adding that the actions of a family member should not be used to remove his child.

In what is believed to be the first confirmation of a long-held belief by sect observers, Louisa Bradshaw, the infant's mother, testified that Jeffs lived in a home on the YFZ Ranch, northeast of Eldorado in Schleicher County. He has since been imprisoned, convicted of arranging marriages between a 14-year-old girl and her 19-year-old cousin.

The revelation came during two hours of tense, inconsistent, often confusing testimony by Bradshaw. She frequently told CPS attorneys she does not know or could not remember answers to simple questions such as what room in her dormitory-style house on the YFZ Ranch was next to hers, or who attended her wedding ceremony.

Asked later whether she believes a grown man kissing a girl on the mouth is appropriate, Bradshaw replied: "Everyone has their free agency."

CPS attorneys and local attorney Randol Stout, representing the infant, hammered Bradshaw and Jessop over the photos - particularly as they relate to Jessop's father, ranch leader Merrill Jessop, and his many wives and dozens of children, at least 45 of whom were named in court as siblings or half-siblings of Rulon Daniel Jessop.

Attorneys for the parents objected to the questions, citing the appellate court decision, which said CPS must show immediate physical danger to a child it is seeking to remove.

"I do believe emotional damage is outside the scope of this hearing," Matassarin said.

Stout responded that the appellate ruling was under appeal.

"As far as I can tell, (the ruling) hasn't changed the Family Code," he said. "Emotional well-being is one of the terms" allowed in making such a decision.

Walther - a former court master who heard solely family law cases before being elected to the bench - agreed with a slow shake of her head.

"I believe it's in the statute," she said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cpswatch; flds; jeffs; polygamy; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-669 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2008 6:09:06 AM PDT by Flo Nightengale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale

What a mess!!!


2 posted on 05/24/2008 6:19:32 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale
"I tried to narrow the scope and keep things moving along (in April), and the complaint was I didn't let enough evidence in," Walther said of the en masse custody hearing in which she granted the state temporary custody of the children. "We're going to have a full-blown adversarial hearing. If it takes two or three days, so be it,

What does she mean by that?

3 posted on 05/24/2008 6:33:19 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; ...

Ping


4 posted on 05/24/2008 6:38:55 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

It means someone got caught with thier hand in the cookie jar and now they are in CYA mode.


5 posted on 05/24/2008 6:39:24 AM PDT by tueffelhunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

It sort of sounds like—”You wanted hearings? I’ll give you hearings!” If her intent is that each individual child/group of siblings is going to have hearings lasting 2-3 days, this could last forever, which sort of shows why the hearings were conducted as they were in the beginning. Rock, meet hard place.


6 posted on 05/24/2008 6:42:38 AM PDT by Flo Nightengale (Keep sweet? I'll show you sweet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale

Doe anyone know how to post the pics next to the article? I’m impaired that way. They’re pretty disturbing.


7 posted on 05/24/2008 6:43:56 AM PDT by Flo Nightengale (Keep sweet? I'll show you sweet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale

That’s how I read it too. How will she do this though? They all have to be heard by sometime in June huh? I kind of chuckled..it read like “you want evidence...I’ll show you evidence” Next week should be interesting.


8 posted on 05/24/2008 6:46:43 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale

There’s kissing, and then there’s kissing. An older man can kiss a child on the forehead or the cheek, and that’s kissing.

What I see in those photos... that’s child abuse.

This is a cult based on child abuse. It’s hard to determine which parents are unfit, but certainly many, many are.

The state should keep the kids until they sort this out.


9 posted on 05/24/2008 6:50:39 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale
Seems like Warren Jeff is Joseph Smith's true disciple. After all here is a list of Joseph Smith's wives, including two 14 year olds, and a pair of sisters that supposedly didn't know they had both married the same guy until afterwards.
Wife Date Age Husband*
Emma Hale
Fanny Alger
Lucinda Morgan Harris
Louisa Beaman
Zina Huntington Jacobs
Presendia Huntington Buell
Agnes Coolbrith
Sylvia Sessions Lyon
Mary Rollins Lightner
Patty Bartlett Sessions
Marinda Johnson Hyde
Elizabeth Davis Durfee
Sarah Kingsley Cleveland
Delcena Johnson
Eliza R. Snow
Sarah Ann Whitney
Martha McBride Knight
Ruth Vose Sayers
Flora Ann Woodworth
Emily Dow Partridge
Eliza Maria Partridge
Almera Johnson
Lucy Walker
Sarah Lawrence
Maria Lawrence
Helen Mar Kimball
Hanna Ells
Elvira Cowles Holmes
Rhoda Richards
Desdemona Fullmer
Olive Frost
Melissa Lott
Nancy Winchester
Fanny Young
Jan 1827
1833
1838
Apr 1841
Oct 1841
Dec 1841
Jan 1842
Feb 1842
Feb 1842
Mar 1842
Apr 1842
Jun 1842
Jun 1842
Jul 1842
Jun 1842
Jul 1842
Aug 1842
Feb 1843
Spring 1843
Mar 1843
Mar 1843
Apr 1843
May 1843
May 1843
May 1843
May 1843
Mid 1843
Jun 1843
Jun 1843
Jul 1843
Mid 1843
Sep 1843
1843
Nov 1843
22
16
37
26
20
31
33
23
23
47
27
50
53
37
38
17
37
33
16
19
22
30
17
17
19
14
29
29
58
32
27
19
14
56
NONE
NONE
George W. Harris
NONE
Henry Jacobs
Norman Buell
NONE
Windsor Lyon
Adam Lightner
David Sessions
Orson Hyde
Jabez Durfee
John Cleveland
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Edward Sayers
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Jonathan Holmes
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
* Living Husband at the time of
   Marriage to Joseph Smith
    References
Source: Wives of Joseph Smith.org

10 posted on 05/24/2008 6:50:42 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Thugs wearing body armor and carrying machine guns tear 450 children/infants from their mothers, all without any proof of harm or abuse having been inflicted upon the kids and this judge along with raving MSM show-ponies like Nancy Grace continue to make utterly unsupported claims. And now, this typically out-of-control judge ignores the rulings of a higher court. When a scene like this can be prompted by a phony phone call from a known scam artist, we have a nation in real trouble. The state has become all powerful and the rights of citizens are totally ignored. Scary.


11 posted on 05/24/2008 6:53:53 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I agree. The pictures are stomach turning.
12 posted on 05/24/2008 6:56:23 AM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Photobucket
13 posted on 05/24/2008 6:57:22 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

If that was my 12 year old daughter Jeffs wouldn’t be in prison right now, I would.


14 posted on 05/24/2008 7:01:57 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale

Those photos are really disturbing.


15 posted on 05/24/2008 7:02:00 AM PDT by senorita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

What do you think about this picture?


16 posted on 05/24/2008 7:02:03 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I would.

Nope I'd put you up for a good citizen reward!!!

17 posted on 05/24/2008 7:05:27 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I disagree.

Warren Jeffs is in jail. He will no longer be a threat to the community. Nevertheless, I don’t see how that justifies taking 450 kids away from all their families. The parents have no parental rights. They are not allowed contact. No accomdations are made to ensure the kids are not exposed to anything the parents find objectionable (i.e. public schools, religion, etc).

The government will probably have mercy only on those parents that publicly renounce their religion.


18 posted on 05/24/2008 7:05:28 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
What does she mean by that?

She's sending the attorney's for the perverts a message, don't screw with the court! You will be here a very, very, very, long time.

19 posted on 05/24/2008 7:07:50 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flo Nightengale
I'm sorry, but anyone who condones this is lower than the lowest. This is nothing more than child molesting, and only a child molester could applaud a 50 year old man "marrying" a 13 year old. (And by the way, other articles place her age at 12. That's TWELVE.)
20 posted on 05/24/2008 7:08:34 AM PDT by MizSterious (God bless the Texas Rangers for freeing women & children from sexual slavery and abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-669 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson