So now we’re jumping from forced unions, mock weddings, statutory rape of young minors to already married men to women (not girls) who voluntarily (not forced) sleep with men?
Yet, the lesbians running child services chose to target a patriarchy cult and drag all the members through Hell using abusive power of the state. It really is a strange statistic where a non criminal patriarchy is punished while the criminal matriarchy goes unchecked.
Nonsequitor: Most of what you’re talking about is legal (as in l-e-g-a-l). For that which isn’t (pregnant or assaulted minors in the ghetto + an adult male...not just another minor), ya know somebody’s got to report something to even trigger it. And, yes, a problem exists there that it’s often “accepted.” But once the report is out, it needs to be followed up on.
Most of what goes on in the ghetto is older men preying on younger women and older women preying on younger men. There is one important difference. The child born to polygamous patriarchy at least know who is his father. In the matriarchal village families of the ghetto, the child often has no idea who is his father. The social consequences are more ruinous to the latter as it creates a drifter out of the male. The difference in polygamy between the Texas case and the greater national problem is one where the former has paperwork for its marriages and the latter does not. To legally argue they are not alike, your non sequitur, is to support form over substance. It's a shallow view.
Snitching can get you busted up real bad, baby!