If you would like to see them rescued, then why would you object to it when it really did happen? Who would you propose rescues them, then?
These children were rescued and you're calling the rescuers kidnappers and clearly implying that the death penalty should be administered to them; that they should be put to death for their actions, as in posts 217 and 291.
The women were given the opportunity to leave with the children. Some did, some went back. Would you rescue adult women against their will?
I object because the CPS over reached. The CPS went in looking for Sarah and found a wall of disinformation and silence so they grabbed all the girls in Sarah's age range. That was OK and justifiable, based on the distress call and warrants.
But The CPS quickly determined that the original roundup hadn't rescued Sarah. So they went back in and grabbed more kids and even adult women this time, desperate to find Sarah. Still no Sarah. So the CPS decided to simply take all of the kids, because at this point there was no turning back and they were discovering that "Sarah" might have been a prank call. The CPS was in trouble and now they are trying to justify their actions and save Texas from a huge liability.
These children were rescued and you're calling the rescuers kidnappers and clearly implying that the death penalty should be administered to them; that they should be put to death for their actions, as in posts 217 and 291.
The CPS grabbed, imprisoned, stripped, photographed and interrogated without an attorney present, adult women. That is clearly in violation of the Federal Color of Law statute. Are you stating that the CPS did not violate the law?
The women were given the opportunity to leave with the children. Some did, some went back. Would you rescue adult women against their will?
Are you stating that the women were given the opportunity to leave with all of their children? That is a lie and you know it. I know that you have been following this case closely. Why would you state a lie like that?