Police do not have a legal obligation to stop someone from shooting me. They do have an obligation to apprehend and prosecute that person after he shoots me. I would show you the legal cases but like I said, I wouldn't presume to think that you might understand.
And you would be the ones defending Jeffs clan by stating there is no proof of abuses at YFZ. I think it is quite analgous to the anti-abortion groups posting pictures of aborted fetuses - the shock value is meant to get past the non-visual baflegab.
Obviously you think that if someone breaks the law, that justifies breaking the law to catch them. All that really accomplishes is breaking and denigrating the law.
When you posted the pictures you accused me of getting my kicks off from pictures like that. In my book that makes you a pedophile and a pervert for thinking that way.
Well, there’s a whole thread on it here, all in relation to how Jeffs was very much involved at YFZ:
All that thread proves is that there are a whole lot of sick twisted perverts like you, running dog.
Let’s see, a picture is not a fact, but calling us perverts is a fact but not emotion???
You are the pervert that posted the picture and said that the rest of us got our kicks by looking at the picture you posted. That is perverted and sick.
You can twist in the wind all day, but it won't change the fact that you are one sick bent pervert.
“Police do not have a legal obligation to stop someone from shooting me. They do have an obligation to apprehend and prosecute that person after he shoots me. I would show you the legal cases but like I said, I wouldn’t presume to think that you might understand. “
Because you are an atheist, you are caught up in legalisms because you have nothing to fall back on. The police, thank God, in most cases also act under moral obligation (otherwise you’d never hear of them doing anything to stop a crime in progress, they’d just barricade an apartment, let the wife and kids be killed and then arrest the perp when he ran out of food).
“They do have an obligation to apprehend and prosecute that person after he shoots me.”
Well, following your earlier kind blessing that I get everything due to me, I wish you the same kind of police protection. Fortunately, 99% of the police do not act that way, and most times they are given a pass for justifiable actions in the line of duty.
[Obviously you think that if someone breaks the law, that justifies breaking the law to catch them. All that really accomplishes is breaking and denigrating the law. ]
Heck yes, if there is a kid who will be killed if an officer fails to break numerous jaywalking/speeding/entry/wiretapping laws, then that officer has a moral obligation to do so and “the law” is there to sort it out afterwards. It does not denigrate the law at all to serve the greater good, as long as checks and balances are in place. That’s why, for example, people are given immunity for testimony (or does that denigrate the law in your view?). In other words, your blanket admonition against lawbreaking is a sieve full of holes.
“All that thread proves is that there are a whole lot of sick twisted perverts like you, running dog. “
Oh great, another name to call me. My isn’t that unique, more inspired name calling: [sick twisted pervert running dog]
I’m going to make a suggestion, just skip the verbs because they get in the way of the names. No “emotionalism” from you, just unadulterated “hate” and “vituperation”.
“You are the pervert that posted the picture and said that the rest of us got our kicks by looking at the picture you posted. That is perverted and sick. “
And you are the enabler for the whole FLDS clan, which multiplies any of my projected sins a few thousand fold. But, that’s right, you don’t believe in sin because you are a Mormon turned atheist. And you obviously don’t believe in a higher moral law.
So I guess everyone should believe you, even though you answer to no one but yourself.