Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
WW,

You would need a separate fuel system from tanks to injectors much as if you did a gaseous conversion. It is costly. If you had both storage/fuel systems you could run on all three, but the price would be higher.

Go here: http://www.flexdi.com

On the air assisted side of their injector, they could run the gaseous fuel through it for only one injector per engine. These guys have got one trick solution.

17 posted on 05/23/2008 8:22:26 AM PDT by taildragger (The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: taildragger
"You would need a separate fuel system from tanks to injectors much as if you did a gaseous conversion. It is costly."

Which is also true if you convert any existing "non-flex-fuel" vehicle to use propane/LPG/LNG. So, I have to ask again---why "not" require that any vehicle produced in or imported to the US be "flex-fuel" qualified. IIRC the Chevy S10 pickup is already a flex-fuel, and I'm pretty sure there are others. How many, I dunno, as I've not studied the issue.

The technology at your link looks interesting.

24 posted on 05/23/2008 10:09:51 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson