Nope.
The 2 accounts of creation were always understood to be 2 descriptions of the same event until *man* needed to excuse their domination of other races. Then the whole notion of a second creation of inferior peoples began. Now *man* says that DNA won’t allow it. Wrong as well.
Then people started mangling the word of God to make it say things it doesn’t because of what *man* said.
You put more faith in what *man* says than in what the word of God says.
Now who was it that started this supposed always understood to be 2 descriptions of the same event belief? If the same description is repeated then why is it NOT repeated the same? Why after the 7th day of rest did the generations get a notation and yet there was NO man to till the ground? Was there any farmers noted in the first account?
Based upon my limited knowledge of history domination has not been limited to any specific race or ethnicity or even within ethnicities... there are even accounts wherein domination was attempted within immediate families. Race gender and religions get the headlines regarding attempts to dominate in these politically correct religious times.
DNA says what it says it is the code that identifies the flesh physical body and links back to genealogies. The soul/spirit cannot be measure by DNA those characteristics are measured by the acts of the being.
Now your 'twins' link stated that both of these parents were born of white women, yet both of them have received the more dominant genes of their fathers. So at conception one child appeared to have gotten a double does of the father's genes and the other got more likely a triple dose of the mother's genes.
See I do not have an issue with what really took place, and IF what the majority of Christianity claims really happened there is NO way that the Heavenly Father would have allowed another theory to take precedence... Never has and never will.