[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

It's the same stuff that eugenist (and Darwin Medalist) R.A. Fisher used to say. Funny thing is, the poor have more offspring than the upperclass twits, proving that the upperclass are less fit, no? Fisher tried to explain that too. You can go to my FR page and download Fisher's Genetical Theory of Natural Selection and see for yourself. Dawkins said that Fisher was the greatest Darwinian after Darwin. Imagine that, spending your days working on the evolution of upperclass twits and rationalizing why the fertility rates of upper and lower classes are the exact opposite of what Darwinism says they must be. And winning a medal for it.

[GourmetDan]

"It's the same stuff that eugenist (and Darwin Medalist) R.A. Fisher used to say. Funny thing is, the poor have more offspring than the upperclass twits, proving that the upperclass are less fit, no?"

Well, those who believe such things have millions of reasons why observation doesn't fit the theory.