[prolifefirst]

Explicitly pornographic source for the logo is shown at the link.

This article is from 2005, but it is great research on where the recent logo change comes from.

[prolifefirst]

I have drunk my last Starbucks yesterday.

[prolifefirst]

I have drunk my last Starbucks yesterday.

[mnehring]

If this is the standard that what is called ‘pornography’ had been reduced to, we might as well ban most history books, travel channel shows, beaches, art museums, National Geographic, and science textbooks.. jeeze.. people complaining about this really need to get their priorities in order.

[Always Right]

Explicitly pornographic source for the logo is shown at the link

I don't know if I would go as far as calling some poorly drawn naked mermaid logo, 'explicitly pornographic'.

[JamesP81]

Only libs could make coffee so political...

[GSWarrior]

Silliest thread of the day?

[AnAmericanMother]

That's not pornography.

In the 15th century, that was "natural history".

Read Mark Twain's "A Tudor Dinner Table Conversation" if you don't believe me . . . .

[Perdogg]

I think people need to get a life when they start to worry about what’s on a cup of starbucks.

[Alouette]

[Publius6961]

Some people just have waaaaaaay too much time on their hands.

[DManA]

I don't think the artist was drinking coffee when he drew a mermaid with two tails.

[Lx]

I worked with a guy that had the original logo on his coffee cup. Then he dropped it, he was pretty po’d.

[BlueStateBlues]

Starbucks wimped out by changing their logo. They probably raised their prices in honor of the wimpyness. Vultures without even a hint of porno remaining.