Skip to comments.
Obama Takes It Personally
Jewish Press ^
| 5-21-08
Posted on 05/21/2008 8:21:21 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: Eva
A Black Theology of Liberation, Wright wrote: There will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness, asking from the depths of their being: How can we become black? And the press wonders why whites are not voting for Obama - who got rid of his own whiteness early on as soon as he realized it wouldn't benefit him politically. Too bad about his grandmother, but she was expendable.
41
posted on
05/21/2008 3:17:33 PM PDT
by
livius
To: omega4179
After our country was attacked on 9/11 the best candidate the dems could offer us was a terror appeasing fake christian muslim socialist.I was going to remind you that Kerry came before BO, then I thought...
...Hey you did describe Kerry too (although I don't think he's muslim)
42
posted on
05/21/2008 4:09:44 PM PDT
by
SteamShovel
(Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
To: Cicero
As a Presidential Canidate he should not take it personally. Look at President Bush. They have slimed him for eight years but GOD BLESS HIM for never wavering or taking it personally.
43
posted on
05/21/2008 4:14:59 PM PDT
by
ncfool
(Savage said that Islam is a Peaceful religion. Your very peaceful after they slit your throat!)
To: SJackson
"...adding that Hizbullah and Hamas need to be compelled to understand that theyre going down a blind alley with violence that weakens their legitimate claims. Please tell us, Mr. Obama, what do you think are the legitimate claims of Hizbullah and Hamas?
To: SJackson
It just goes to show that amongst his many other faults, Obama is not ready for prime time. There are important events occurring in the Middle East, the President of the United States makes a well-received speech before the Knesset regarding these events, and all Obama can get out of it is a possible, not even probable, reference to to a statement that he himself made, a word that he himself used. He's a small-time politician from the parochial Chicago machine pretending to be one of the big boys. He's getting by on a veneer of "style", but anyone looking deeper (and not many of his supporters seem to have the intelligence to do so)would see that there's no substance. He's a slick pretender, and in no way ready to be leader of the free world. The Democrats (the supporters and self-important pundits, not the ones with the real power, above Obama's pay grade) think this is a game.
45
posted on
05/21/2008 6:42:11 PM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: ncfool
Well, there’s another difference. As you say, the moonbats are constantly calling President Bush a Nazi, and he ignores it with dignity, standing above the fray.
But the reverse didn’t happen. Bush didn’t say that Obama was a pacifier. He never mentioned any names, and could easily have been talking about Carter or many other prominent liberals. But Obama took it personally, and said, “Don’t call ME a pacifier!” Bush in fact never called him anything.
46
posted on
05/21/2008 7:52:22 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson