Simple, Low-cost Carbon Filter Removes 90 Percent Of Carbon Dioxide From Smokestack Gases

ScienceDaily ^ | (May 20, 2008) | staff

[FreedomPoster]

>>Adapt this to auto tailpipes (if the catalytic converter doesn’t take out the CO2 already)

It doesn’t.

[cogitator]

Do you think I necessarily think Greenpeace is right on this?

I don't. I think all technologies need to be investigated. I think Greenpeace is dedicated to a particular viewpoint and they won't consider how new and advanced technologies could address climate change.

[FBD]

exactly. carbon dioxide is plant food, not pollution.

we need scrubbers for other emissions, but CO2 isn’t one of them.

[dirtbiker]

Nice picture, only it's of the water cooling towers at a power plant, and not the "smoke stacks", as they claim.

These "smoke stacks" ARE, however, emitting a "greenhouse gas"...water vapor....

[Straight Vermonter]

If greenpeace said up, I’d think down but I wanted to show that even the green mafia was against this plan.

[I got the rope]

Actually...I think it’s 3 smoke stacks. It looks like a coal-fired unit with flue gas going through a wet scrubbed system. That is why you see the high moisture content.

[fella]

Didn’t AlBore invent the catalytic converter at about the same time that he invented the internet?

[dirtbiker]

Around here, the short, stubby ones are the cooling towers, and the very, very tall skinny ones are the smokestacks. This one looks like it's being re-covered, because there is a derrick perched on top to the right of the pic.

I've also noticed that a lot of Greenpeace's and other evo-wacko videos showing TONS of pollution are shot on extremely cold days, when anything warm will look like it's smoking....