Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon
I may need this someday, so I'm posting it in its entirety. The Sun Times does not need to be excerpted, and I can't afford the link to go dead.

Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) is a former hunter with an arsenal of weapons that reportedly features shotguns, rifles and pistols, including a Walther PPK of James Bond fame.

But there's a problem.

Mell forgot to re-register the weapons as required every year by the ordinance that he helped to pass as one of the City Council's most senior members.

So, what does an alderman do when he finds himself in violation of the law? He writes a new law. Mell has quietly introduced an ordinance that would reopen gun registration in Chicago and create a one-month amnesty for himself and other gun owners in the same predicament.

During the monthlong window, gun owners who attempted to re-register their guns between May 1, 2007, and April 1, 2008, only to be rejected on grounds the registrations had lapsed would be allowed to re-register without penalty.

"It's not just for me. It's for other people with the same problem. It's giving people who legitimately registered their guns at one time only to let it slip by a chance to come back into compliance," Mell said. "Some people didn't realize that, every year, you have to re-register your guns."

As an aldermen who helps write Chicago's gun laws, Mell acknowledged that he should have been in compliance with the re-registration requirement.

"I knew it was the law. I thought it was being done [by a staff member]. If you have a person you trust to do it and they don't do it, then it doesn't get done. I'm not gonna say it's embarrassing. I'm just gonna say I should have done it," the alderman said.

Mell said he first realized he was in violation of the re-registration requirement about a year ago. When he tried to re-register his guns belatedly, the Chicago Police Department's Gun Registration Section refused to bend the rules. Mell appealed that ruling to the city's Department of Administrative Hearings but decided to re-write the law instead."When we looked at the law, we saw the possibility of winning [the appeal] wasn't gonna happen," he said.


10 posted on 05/20/2008 5:55:35 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
The Sun Times does not need to be excerpted...

Thanks. I can't keep up with what must be excerpted so it's safer to just do it.

12 posted on 05/20/2008 6:01:12 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
“When we looked at the law, we saw the possibility of winning [the appeal] wasn't gonna happen,” he said.

Wow. The hubris.

A gun owner of a special sort, I guess.

Why not introduce a law to repeal your asinine anti-Second Amendment regulations.

13 posted on 05/20/2008 6:01:13 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

Strange, I did not know that a staff member, not being said owner of said guns could register said guns for second party.

I thought said owner had to register guns.

But then again Mell is democrat, they make up rules to benefit themselves as they go.

Must be nice to be a democrat. ////// sarcastic comment


33 posted on 05/21/2008 12:09:41 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson