Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Controlling the price of milk? Now *there's* a major sovereignty issue!

Acevedo makes no sense. This is the same decades-old smokescreening by the PPD with plenty of high-sounding rhetoric and no concrete proposals in the end.

1 posted on 05/20/2008 7:35:31 AM PDT by Ebenezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cll

ping


2 posted on 05/20/2008 7:35:53 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrstar96

the u.s. needs to spin off puerto rico.

bye.


3 posted on 05/20/2008 7:39:01 AM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrstar96
Puerto Rico is not going to be allowed to decide which federal laws apply to them. That would give Puerto Rico rights denied to the several states.

Puerto Rico has only three choices: status quo, statehood or independence.

4 posted on 05/20/2008 7:42:45 AM PDT by Procyon (To the global warming fanatics the problem is too many people and the solution is genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrstar96
To him, Puerto Rico under a developed Commonwealth would have absolute control over matters such as the price of milk.

This is an educated guy, who theoretically should know he is talking nonsense.

But guys like this get elected year after year talking exactly this kind of nonsense, and no one out in Oprahland is smart enough to realize they are being played.

They can never deliver on their promises, they either don't try if they're smart, or they do try and do damage without any result. Usually they threaten to try, and the industries involved pay them under the table for the privilege of being left alone, which while technically I suppose thats "corruption", under the circumstances its the best outcome available.

People elect corruption, they just don't always realize they are doing it. Corruption is the grease that makes an irrational system work. People vote for corruption when they vote for things that government can't deliver.

6 posted on 05/20/2008 8:12:57 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rrstar96; cll

At a certain level, I sympathise with the guy. I am no fan of campaign finance laws. But one of the things that make them so bad is that they are complex enough that almost everyone falls afoul of them. The other is that enforcing them inevitably is going to take on the air of a political witch-hunt.

If the offending party wins, who is going to investigate him? And if the offending party loses, going after them after an electoral loss is going to look like political piling on, like the winner is just using his power of office to attack his enemies.

The McCain finance laws are bad news. But the answer is to get rid of them. If you’re being hammered for something like this, I could understand why you’d suddenly want to be protected from bad federal law.

I know Acevedo is accused of lying to investigators, but after Libby, and after Ramos/Compean, that doesn’t impress me much anymore. I don’t give federal investigators the benefit of the doubt I once did.


8 posted on 05/20/2008 8:27:48 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson