Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
There is NO net gain.

That's fine. I'm not saying otherwise.

I'm saying the portion of total taxes coming from criminals and illegals will be more under the nrst than the portion currently collected under the income tax.

If currently legals represent 80% of population but pay 98% of taxes, under the nrst - for example - legals will represent 80% of the population but pay 80% of taxes.

The total paid by illegals will increase and the total paid by legals will decline.

42 posted on 05/20/2008 12:14:58 PM PDT by Principled (Vaporize the "Divide and Conquer" taxes - Have everyone pay the same marginal rate!. NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
I'm saying the portion of total taxes coming from criminals and illegals will be more under the nrst than the portion currently collected under the income tax.

Criminals are avoiding remitting 23% of their gross under the fairtax. I don't see that as any different. Are criminals avoiding 23% of their gross under the income tax? I seriously doubt it. I think it would be pretty close to a wash.

45 posted on 05/20/2008 12:45:39 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson