Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flexible, lightweight, 1-millimeter thick, 125-inch plasma display
Gizmag.com ^ | 05/19/08 | Gizmag.com

Posted on 05/19/2008 9:33:48 AM PDT by Reaganesque

May 19, 2008 There’s at least one reason to look forward to the InfoComm 2008 conference in Las Vegas this June with next-generation large-screen display manufacturer Shinoda Plasma announcing plans to exhibit a flexible, 1-millimeter thick, 125-inch film-type prototype display that can be used as a curved or wrap-around screen.

At a low-key unveiling on May 15, Shinoda Plasma announced plans to exhibit the 3 x 1 meter, (9 feet 10-inches x 3 feet 3-inches) plasma tube array (PTA) display, which consists of 3 seamlessly integrated 1 x 1 meter square sub-modules and offers a resolution of 960 x 360 and weighs in at 3.6 kilograms (8 lbs), or about 10 times less than a conventional plasma display.

Shinodo Plasma is also reportedly intending to begin small-scale production of a 150-inch (3 x 2 meter) version this autumn. While digital signage and advertising applications are sure to be the main uses for the ultrathin displays, there are sure to be plenty of people wanting a display or two for the walls at home to avoid painting.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: 125; display; flexible; plasma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Photo:

Gizmag got their info from

1 posted on 05/19/2008 9:33:49 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Hmm, part of my first reply didn't post. Gizmag got their info from Pink Tentacle.com

Interesting stuff! As a comedian once said: "I'll buy it if they will promise me that this is the last thing they'll invent!" LOL. My wife and I bought a HD-tv recently with that in mind. Oh well!

2 posted on 05/19/2008 9:36:39 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Sure make a large screen TV easier to sell to Mrs. MWT who doens’t want it junking up the den.


3 posted on 05/19/2008 9:37:25 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

There’s actually technology being developed that would allow you to “paint” a tv on your wall. Seriously.


4 posted on 05/19/2008 9:38:44 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Ping


5 posted on 05/19/2008 9:39:05 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
"I'll buy it if they will promise me that this is the last thing they'll invent!" LOL. My wife and I bought a HD-tv recently with that in mind.

Ditto us and DVD player....now we're hearing all about Blu Ray making DVD obsolete. Humbug.

6 posted on 05/19/2008 9:43:39 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
offers a resolution of 960 x 360

Thats GOT to be a mistake. You could individual triplets of LEDS for a higher resolution that that in a 10 foot long screen.
7 posted on 05/19/2008 9:50:36 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Maybe it’s a big blurry display?


8 posted on 05/19/2008 9:52:54 AM PDT by null and void (The one word of Chinese our congress really understands is 'kowtow')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Ping to read later


9 posted on 05/19/2008 9:54:34 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Just looking at the picture you can tell that the 960x360 must be wrong. That would be pixels that are about 1/3 inches square.

9600 x 3600 maybe.


10 posted on 05/19/2008 9:59:28 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“and weighs in at 3.6 kilograms (8 lbs), or about 10 times less than a conventional plasma display.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It is a bad day when a so called technical writer is hired to produce garbage like this. It is impossible for anything to weigh “10 times less” than something else.


11 posted on 05/19/2008 10:08:11 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Yeah, once you get over that ‘one times less’ mark, it gets pretty difficult.


12 posted on 05/19/2008 10:13:31 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Ditto us and DVD player....now we're hearing all about Blu Ray making DVD obsolete. Humbug.

You mean how downloadable content and movies made BOTH obsolete?

13 posted on 05/19/2008 10:15:42 AM PDT by akorahil (Thank You and God bless all Veterans. Truly, the real heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

How much $$$$$$??????


14 posted on 05/19/2008 10:16:58 AM PDT by Global2010 (Waiting for Hillary to pull the Rabbit outa the Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I’m looking forward to OLEDs to be produced in large screens at an affordable price.


15 posted on 05/19/2008 10:17:26 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

You have to wonder what you’re supposed to do with a display with a three to one aspect ratio. Either watch squashed people, a movie without the top or bottom quarter of the picture, or some re-a-l-l-y big black bars on the sides of the screen. Maybe you could divide the feed up and put a photo of your wall on each side...


16 posted on 05/19/2008 10:18:55 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Now we'll be able to watch “2001 a Space Odyssey” in our homes as it was intended to be seen.
17 posted on 05/19/2008 10:19:32 AM PDT by fella (Is he or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

A Homer Simpson MMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... Gurggle. Billboards that are giant TV’s.


18 posted on 05/19/2008 10:24:43 AM PDT by fella (Is he or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Good question.


19 posted on 05/19/2008 10:39:52 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

Imagine what this will do to the Event Hall Rental Business.

Imagine Disney Epcot esque 360 degree video on four walls.

(imagine a bride demanding a hall with video walls depicting the theme of her choice.)

This is going to be a tacky jumbotron in every major gathering.


20 posted on 05/19/2008 10:51:49 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson