Skip to comments.
IRAQ: Speaker Pelosi encounters reality and notices it
Powerline ^
| May 17, 2008
| Paul
Posted on 05/18/2008 10:21:11 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Buried deep in this AP report, between news of a crackdown on al Qaeda in Mosul and a suicide bombing in Baqouba, is Nancy Pelosi's concession that the surge is succeeding. According to AP, the Speaker, who made a surprise visit to Iraq, "expressed confidence that expected provincial elections will promote national reconciliation." She also "welcomed Iraq's progress in passing a budget as well as oil legislation, and a bill paving the way for the provincial elections in the fall that are expected to more equitably redistribute power among local officials."
As Abe Greenwald points out, in February Pelosi said that the purpose of the surge was to create a secure time for the government of Iraq to make the political change to bring reconciliation to Iraq; they have not done that." Since she now finds the government is making the changes that will promote reconciliation, it should follow that, in her estimation, the surge is well on its way to accomplishing its purpose.
Perhaps this is the prelude to Pelosi adopting Senator George Aiken's prescription for Vietnam, "declare victory and leave." But acknowledging this much progress is dangerous for those who advocate our withdrawal since (a) the public may be less enthusiastic about pulling out entirely if it thinks we're succeding and (b) in the event of serious deterioration post-withdrawal, it will be clear that we snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
To comment on this post go here.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdadsurge; iraq; pelosi; surrendercrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Liberty2007
Thank you for your service, and for the update.
Love your homepage!
21
posted on
05/18/2008 11:35:43 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: All
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
OH.....that's right! It's late here and I'm tired.
First she annoints herself S-o-S and now C-i-C. I despise these "people"
23
posted on
05/18/2008 11:36:48 PM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Nancy Pelosi: worthless and weak.
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: Liberty2007
That sounds good. All the news not fit for the media to print. Thanks for the report and most especially to you and the rest of our nation’s best for what you are doing to the terrorists. God bless you!
26
posted on
05/19/2008 4:53:48 AM PDT
by
bushfamfan
(The sunrise has turned into a sunset.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If a Democrat wins the White House they won't need congressional approval to remove the troops and if they do win, anything short of removal of ALL troops proves they are liars. I'm sure they'll get a free pass from the MSM and anti-war activist if the Rats win the White House and there will still be 100,000 troops there.
27
posted on
05/19/2008 5:07:32 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: Liberty2007
they are probably stockpiling for a major offensive.I heard similar reports both in Baghdad and Mosul. It never happened, but I suppose there's always a first time for anything.
28
posted on
05/19/2008 5:15:36 AM PDT
by
Future Snake Eater
(From "hooah!" to "meh..." in only three weeks' time...)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I am sure by the end of the week we shall hear her make some stupid comment to the press that the democrats must get us out of this big mess in Iraq Bush was responsible.
She is a clever snake with a forked tongue.
For her to really acknowledge success in Iraq at this point would be to lessen either of the socialist's chances of winning over McCain. And surely the L/MSM shall keep what she said low key. Then again it may not matter for surely McCain will use her comments in the near future to his advantage.
Meanwhile on the eastern front, ahem. AQIR sure looks like it proves nothing at this point by staying in Iraq. As they fall apart, the Iraqi forces increase in power to further confront them.
29
posted on
05/19/2008 8:37:49 AM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Duncan Hunter was our best choice...)
To: Liberty2007
My wife’s cousin has been about 140 miles east of Baghdad, within sight of Iran, for the past 6 months or so. Last weekend (on R&R stateside) he told me it is very quiet, they find caches of weapons and ordnance - including Iranian EFPs - but very little in terms of firefights or IEDs. Usually very boring. But, the surge is not working...
30
posted on
05/19/2008 11:49:09 AM PDT
by
astounded
(The Democrat Party is a Clear and Present Danger to the USA)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
31
posted on
05/19/2008 10:29:12 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson