The other hits may be derived from JW, or they may have a common origin, but I stand by my reasoning and conclusions. I am grateful in any event for the effort of each of you in helping me try to get at the truth. I applaud JW for what they are trying to do here but don’t think it helps their cause any to have inaccurate information on their site.
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361259X01902090
Medical site showing 800 g (without micro )
First-trimester pregnancy termination with 800 g of vaginal ..
ww.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a741641631~jumptype=rss -
another medical site that uses 800 g on their post without using micro in front of the g.
Now It is apparent that these sites ARE NOT related to JW.
If you want more sites to find the truth I suggest trying search.
There is even a post with a ? in front of g. so I don’t know why the problem but there is a problem.