To: EDINVA
How is it any different if the law school invited, say, Michael Moore, as a commencement speaker? Both are solely partisan speakers, and add nothing to the ceremony but contraversy.
48 posted on
05/18/2008 10:02:40 AM PDT by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: jude24; kellynla; EDINVA; Ultra Sonic 007; EternalVigilance; rightinthemiddle
Both are solely partisan speakers, and add nothing to the ceremony but contraversy.
Even if that were true, the controversy of someone like Michael Moore is due to his deviance from founding principles, whereas the 'controversy' over Schlafly is due to her faithful and successful advocacy of founding principles.
51 posted on
05/18/2008 1:43:06 PM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: jude24
How is it any different if the law school invited, say, Michael Moore, as a commencement speaker? Both are solely partisan speakers, and add nothing to the ceremony but contraversy. One of them is a political activist,
the other is Michael Moore.
52 posted on
05/18/2008 3:47:22 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Never apologize, Mister. It';s a sign of weakness" - Nathan Brittles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson