Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer1

A story in USA Today last year regarding bat safety had this quote “an American Legion Baseball study in 2005 found no substantial scientific proof that wooden bats are safer than metal bats.” I don’t know anything more about it than that though.


9 posted on 05/17/2008 10:35:11 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ZGuy

As a kid...we used only wooden bats. I sat there once...barely 30 feet from the batter when he swung and the bat broke. The broke end came my direction and fell around five feet from me. I sat there and thought...man, it’d be great to have steel bats that wouldn’t break. Maybe I was wrong though.


22 posted on 05/17/2008 11:23:33 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

It’s very rare, if it you get hit just right in the chest, with a baseball or a fist, it stuns the heart into stopping. It’s tragic, but an unavoidable risk of being a human being. The parents ought to sue God, nature, gaia or Darwin, according to their faith.


46 posted on 05/18/2008 3:39:14 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (I'm just a typical bitter, white, heteronormative space worm clinging to guns and God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

The science is pretty clear, balls do leave metal bats with more velocity than when hit with a wooden bat. Not sure what study you are quoting other than perhaps they found no conclusive evidence that this speed results in more injuries.. but there is no doubt or debate that balls do come off metal bats with higher velocities.


130 posted on 05/19/2008 10:54:59 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson