Replies

It is possible to make reasonably accurate projections...

Libspeak. Pure, 100% libspeak. You sound like you're quoting PP, fcol.

Hold on tight to those "possibilities" and to your "reasonably accurate projections." They are meaningless when compared to the cold, hard fact that you are obstinately refusing to admit, which I will post once more: Abortion is the intentional, deliberate murder of an innocent, unique human life. I get it. You're okay with that.

You could have saved me a lot of wasted time arguing with you by simply stating "I am pro-abortion." Coward.

This is precisely why, 35 years after Roe v. Wade was decided, the pro-life movement has failed to gain any significant traction in the public sphere. You refuse to even think about the practical implications of your policy positions.

I think we can all agree that abortion is one of the great evils of our time, but you can't ignore the fact that there would be even more Democrats and other undesirables without it. And let's face facts - aside from a few zealots, most Americans care a lot more about crime (and other issues affecting them directly) than the rights of the unborn.

You have utterly failed to convince me (a fellow conservative, no less) that it is in my own best interest to support your position. How do you expect to sell the pro-life message to moderates and independents?