Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjw; SunkenCiv; All

Check out Butanol, it is much more efficient than ethanol, and can be made of a lot more different plant wastes. DuPont and another large company are looking into it. The BTUs on ethanol are 85,000, on butanol 110,000, and on gasoline 115,000, so you can see it is a lot more energetic than ethanol. Also it can be shipped through pipelines, is less volatile thus safer. The only problem is that it doesn’t smell so good. It may be marketable before cellulosic ethanol, or algae biodiesel, something to watch.


70 posted on 05/24/2008 12:17:47 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
butanol site:freerepublic.com
Google

73 posted on 05/24/2008 12:54:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

I read up on it. Apparently Butanol can be used as a one for one replacement for gasoline without problems and is nearly equal to gasoline in energy and can be produced from biomass or “fossil” fuels. My first and most obvious inference is that we should be making butanol from coal and or from KUDZU. KUDZU is the only known indestructible plant that will grow anywhere it is actively DIScouraged. Trying to kill KUDZU only results in more and stronger KUDZU so why not make it into fuel which will not require us to alter a vehicle in any way.

I only know what I read but it sounds good to me ;>)


85 posted on 04/03/2011 8:25:57 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a liberal is like teaching algebra to a tomcat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson