Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HerrBlucher
He had just annexed Austria, which was German-speaking, without bloodshed

Hitler used a diabolical mixture of subversion and the threat of bloodshed to take over Austria. And the German-speaking people of Bohemia were pawns in Hitler's cynical game to destroy Czechoslovakia. The author seems to think that German-speaking people were somehow the rightful property of Hitler. Does the author really believe that since Hitler was skilful at subversion and brainwashing, that somehow made him legitimate?

48 posted on 05/16/2008 9:13:32 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Wilhelm Tell
Does the author really believe that since Hitler was skilful at subversion and brainwashing, that somehow made him legitimate?

I don't think he really knows what he believes except that he felt the need to defend Obama's proposed appeasement, and that led him to his extremely ignorant and foolish article. I am hoping we get more of this complete idiocy from the left as the Obama campaign moves forward.

67 posted on 05/16/2008 10:11:55 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Asked on his deathbed why he was reading the bible, WC Fields replied "I'm looking for loopholes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson