Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right; wbill
Cool. But how big is the lens? Doesn't matter if the photovoltaic is 1 cm^2 if the lens is 1 m^2. Yeah, I am puzzled by this also.

You're still collecting about the same amount of sunlight, either way.

The advantage of using a concentrator is that lenses are a lot cheaper to build, maintain, and replace than the photovoltaics. You can save a lot of money by reducing the number of expensive components you have to buy.

25 posted on 05/16/2008 9:15:30 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
Yeah, that's a good point on the lens being a cheaper component. I just skimmed the article - my thought was "who cares if the PV is a little tiny thing, if you need a massive lens to make it work?"

The maximum amount of energy from sunlight that you can get per area is more-or-less a constant...I'm guessing that all the lens does is take a big area and condense it down to a small one. Hopefully, no one is planning to turn up (or down lol!) the sun to satisfy some power requirement.

I wonder if this PV is more efficient, or can use superconductors to minimize the transmission losses?

26 posted on 05/16/2008 9:22:16 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson