No sweat, there will be a backlash and the people pushing this activism will soon be in a worse place than when they began.
Only to be RE-OVERTURNED again?
It ain’t “gay” (having or showing a merry, lively mood) nor is it “marriage (Matthew 19:4 - 6).
Next step — legalized marriage between a man and a man’s best friend. Woof!
Well I hope you have more luck than we here in Mass. did. Our legislature wouldn’t allow the question to even be placed on the ballot despite having gathered the largest number of signatures for any petition in the state’s history.
From Massachusetts to California, the black-robed tyrants
have eliminated the role of the citizen’s votes.
I so desperately want a polygamist, necrophile, zoophile, and a brother/sister to petition the state for marriage licenses.
What possible objections could there be to these unions?
Sometimes the extremes are needed to make the point.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
-Thomas Jefferson
Sadly, this is the only way the “enlightened” can pass their agenda. Activist courts are truly the worst.
“In the majority decision authored by Chief Justice Ronald George, he wrote “an individual’s sexual orientation — like a person’s race or gender — does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights.” “
Whole cloth. So now a purely chosen thing like deviant sex is analogous to gender or race? Who says? What is the basis of this shift after 5000 years history and precedent? The fall is coming at this nation like a bullet train.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus