Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Mirage: The senator is not ready-for-prime-time commander-in-chief.
National Review ^ | 2/4/2008 | Andrew McCarthy

Posted on 05/15/2008 1:45:25 PM PDT by mojito

[snip] ....The sales job is a myth. In reality, a McCain presidency would promise an entirely conventional, center-left, multilateralism.

If you liked the second Bush term, if you liked Clintonian foreign policy, you will find much to admire in a Commander-in-Chief McCain. There would be the same agonizing over European and Islamic perceptions of America; the same doctrinaire commitment to the alchemy of democracy promotion; and the same fondness for heaping more unaccountable bureaucratic sprawl atop the already counter-productive agencies and multinational institutions that frustrate the United States at every turn.

Don’t take my word for it. Read McCain’s own Foreign Affairs essay, published late last year, in which the senator dilates on his philosophy. The leitmotif of “An Enduring Peace Built on Freedom” is that America’s tattered standing in the world must be restored. Typical is this:

"We cannot build an enduring peace based on freedom by ourselves. We must be willing to listen to our democratic allies. Being a great power does not mean that we can do whatever we want whenever we want, nor should we assume that we have all the wisdom, knowledge, and resources necessary to succeed. When we believe international action — whether military, economic, or diplomatic — is necessary, we must work to persuade our friends and allies that we are right. And we must also be willing to be persuaded by them. To be a good leader, America must be a good ally."

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; andrewmccarthy; cicmccain; johnmccain; mccain; mccainforeignpolicy; multilateralist; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Apercu
You can't seriously believe you can simply tread water through four years of the RATs best friend. He will accommodate and even take the lead in the policies RATs love so much. There will be no opposition after the catastrophic defeat in congress that is coming. And McCain will be very comfortable with that.
21 posted on 05/15/2008 3:21:12 PM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
I will vote for McCain because he at least served his country in the military. For all I know obomba may have served for the enemy if he wasn't such a chicken.
I think McCain may appoint a judge that believes the constitution.
You have the right to vote as you want, but either way we will all have a dangerous future.
22 posted on 05/15/2008 3:34:15 PM PDT by Big Horn (I am bitter, I just want to eat my waffle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Calpernia; calcowgirl; indylindy; AuntB; Tennessee Nana; pissant; SoConPubbie; AnimalLover; ..
if you liked Clintonian foreign policy, you will find much to admire in a Commander-in-Chief McCain.

CAMPAIGN SLOGAN!!! ;)

23 posted on 05/15/2008 3:49:58 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Sorry Kent, my GOP gag reflex has been worn out today. I am getting the dry heaves. LOL


24 posted on 05/15/2008 3:57:27 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: isrul

I wish you weren’t right, but you are. That is why I am feeling ill.


25 posted on 05/15/2008 3:59:42 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: E. Cartman

Explain how Obama or Clinton offer a better alternative. Those are the choices. Better suck it up and get used to it.

The time for this discussion was 8 months ago and no I did not vote for McCain in my primary.


26 posted on 05/15/2008 4:03:39 PM PDT by weegee (Vote NO on Marxism in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mojito
McCain's Senior Team - questions about John McCain's foreign policy plans
Insight on the News, March 13, 2000 by J. Michael Waller
(snip)

National-security issues, which McCain sees as one of his strongest points, may end up being his Achilles' heel. Already there is concern among his conservative friends that McCain may lack the disposition to command, showing an uncertain sense of purpose and outright bad political judgment.

"What's the first thing you would do as president?" the Detroit News recently asked McCain.

"The first thing I would do," the candidate answered, "is call in John Kerry, Bob Kerrey, Joe Biden, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Dick Lugar, Chuck Hagel and several others and say we've got to get foreign-policy, national-security issues back on track."

That statement ricocheted through cyberspace, with Washington national-security experts wondering, "Is McCain nuts?" The formula doesn't compute:


27 posted on 05/15/2008 4:08:33 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"The first thing I would do," the candidate answered, "is call in John Kerry

Running frantically in the direction of a demonstrable traitor, in order to (in his own words) "get foreign-policy, national-security issues back on track."

Revolting... and absolutely indefensible.

28 posted on 05/15/2008 4:12:50 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
He wants approval in his old age, he gets it from the MSM and liberals.

Keep up, would you? McCain only got approval from liberals and the MSM when he disagreed with Bush. Now they hate McCain and will do anything to see Obama in the White House.

29 posted on 05/15/2008 4:13:14 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gorush

“McCain’s age is the only thing that gives me a glimmer of hope.”

Ditto. I feel dirty for thinking that way but I feel I must always look for the silver lining.


30 posted on 05/15/2008 4:14:13 PM PDT by Grunthor (Juan agrees with Ted Kennedy on Amnesty, Gore on GW & says Hillary'd be a good POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

“If that happens and he has not selected somone as vice-president, there would be one Helluva scramble on the GOP side.”

They would likely (at the convention) go with the person that had the next highest delegate count.


31 posted on 05/15/2008 4:15:40 PM PDT by Grunthor (Juan agrees with Ted Kennedy on Amnesty, Gore on GW & says Hillary'd be a good POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mojito

What and Shrillary or Obama are?


32 posted on 05/15/2008 4:17:15 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apercu

“I’d rather tread water with McCain for 4 years than sink like the Titanic with either of those two.”

Won’t treading water be difficult with all those knife wounds in your back?


33 posted on 05/15/2008 4:17:32 PM PDT by Grunthor (Juan agrees with Ted Kennedy on Amnesty, Gore on GW & says Hillary'd be a good POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Apercu

34 posted on 05/15/2008 4:20:20 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Ask me if I care? I could care less about old spineless sellout liberal republicans. If he wins by happenstance, so be it, if he doesn’t, nothing will be any different than under any other Democrat. Doesn’t matter what fox is guarding the henhouse. A fox is a fox.


35 posted on 05/15/2008 4:21:08 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

“McCain only got approval from liberals and the MSM when he disagreed with Bush. Now they hate McCain and will do anything to see Obama in the White House.”

Yes. I...feel...so..bad...for...him.


36 posted on 05/15/2008 4:21:14 PM PDT by Grunthor (Juan agrees with Ted Kennedy on Amnesty, Gore on GW & says Hillary'd be a good POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Which of the two presidential nominees, SnObama or McLame, is more “ready for prime time”?

Yes,and adults will deal with the issue non-hysterically. Those are the choices, as unfortunate as they are. It's like choosing between Nixon and Humphrey or Nixon and McGovern.

37 posted on 05/15/2008 4:26:20 PM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gorush
McCain’s age is the only thing that gives me a glimmer of hope.

I also hope, but ONLY if the right person is selected for Veep.

38 posted on 05/15/2008 4:29:42 PM PDT by COBOL2Java ("We are slayed. The party is dead--dead--dead!" - Whig Rep. Lewis Campbell (and so will go the GOP))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Explain how Obama or Clinton offer a better alternative. Those are the choices. Better suck it up and get used to it.

No. What we need is a CONSERVATIVE in power, not some grizzled old fart who, in the end, stands only for John McanCia. If MacNuts were serious about protecting the US, he wouldn't demand closing down GITMO, he wouldn't oppose "torture" of prisoners, he'd support reducing our dependency on foreign oil by not actively opposing drilling in ANWR, he wouldn't leave our southern border wide open and he wouldn't have supported establishing an Islamo-fascist regime in Kosovo.

BEST to vote for a real conservative and tell the CINO MacNaic to go f__k himself and the elephant he rode in on.

39 posted on 05/15/2008 4:31:41 PM PDT by E. Cartman (Ronald Reagan's single biggest mistake: Picking Poppy Bush to be his veep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I hope these panty waist turds get what makes them so afraid, they are so weak and pathetic. They have sealed their own fate, and are too dense to realize it.

They need a purge.


40 posted on 05/15/2008 4:31:50 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson