Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TraditionalistMommy
The government would stop interfering with “marriage” altogether. Marriage would be a religious institution, and the government would recognize something like civil unions instead. Opposite and same sex couples could get a civil union. It keeps government out of religious marriage, and allows individual churches to determine whether or not they want to allow same sex marriage. It protects the word “marriage,” which is very important to some people, from government interference. Opposite and same sex couples could get a civil union.

Hmmmm...see post 414.

415 posted on 05/15/2008 10:25:22 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
Read #26 here:

http://freerepublic.info/focus/f-news/1226386/posts

Your familiar with Antonio Gramsci, aren't you?


A lot of folks here just don't get it.

George Santayana:
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.


418 posted on 05/15/2008 10:37:31 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson