To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I certainly don't agree with Al Gore's global warming BS, but I do think that Newt Gingrich has a point when he says that we can't let the Lefties and the envirofacists own this discussion. On this subject, they rule the field.
If McCain wants to lay some groundwork so that a reasonable voice can talk about this subject, I have no objection.
All that oil that sits in ANWAR and all the oil in the Gulf of Mexico is a very good reason to start hitting back at the GW cult.
10 posted on
05/15/2008 4:28:16 AM PDT by
ishabibble
(ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: ishabibble
12 posted on
05/15/2008 4:31:51 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
To: ishabibble
Newt is drinking the same warming koolaid as McCain. He says in the Pelosi ad that we must do something about climate change.
43 posted on
05/15/2008 5:58:45 AM PDT by
Oldhunk
To: ishabibble
I certainly don't agree with Al Gore's global warming BS, but I do think that Newt Gingrich has a point when he says that we can't let the Lefties and the envirofacists own this discussion. On this subject, they rule the field. If McCain wants to lay some groundwork so that a reasonable voice can talk about this subject, I have no objection. Yet Gore, Gingrich, and McCain all agree (It's real, the debate is over, need to spend trillions to fix it, etc ....)
How can you "not agree" with Gore but have "no objection" to McCain when they are saying the same thing?
62 posted on
05/15/2008 11:22:24 AM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson