Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
El Gato said: "Now if I were making the rules, ..."

If I were making the rules, I would use primaries to ELIMINATE candidates. Every state would have a primary on February 1. Only the top four candidates nation-wide would remain for a second nation-wide primary election on March 1. Three would remain on the ballot for an election on April 1 and the selection of a candidate from the top two would take place on May 1.

144 posted on 05/15/2008 9:28:49 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
If I were making the rules, I would use primaries to ELIMINATE candidates. Every state would have a primary on February 1. Only the top four candidates nation-wide would remain for a second nation-wide primary election on March 1. Three would remain on the ballot for an election on April 1 and the selection of a candidate from the top two would take place on May 1.

That might work out. I'd take away the special privileges for the parties entirely. If they want to pick a single candidate to run in that first primary, fine, it's a free country. But others would be free to run in it as well. If that means that after the first primary, or the second, all the candidates are from the same party, that's OK too.

151 posted on 05/15/2008 10:18:57 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson