Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"People will trust my stewardship not only because of my background and knowledge, but also my vision for the future," he told reporters during a news conference at a nature center in the foothills of the Cascade Mountains.

"They have never, to my knowledge, been involved in legislation nor hearings nor engagement on this issue."

--

This is almost funny, almost,,and he claims to be in the know re: Gloabl Warming.

1 posted on 05/14/2008 6:14:55 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: NormsRevenge; Defendingliberty; Genesis defender; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; ..
Seems rather proud of being the first idjit on the block.

 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 05/14/2008 6:18:08 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Stewardship, my arse!

Looks like it may not matter much who wins on this issue as they all would seek to do all the wrong things anyway.

A pox on both parties that put dunderheads up as their candidates and dare, no insult, voters to get them elected.

Both parties would rather have limited turn-outs and a smaller voter pool to draw from, it’s a lot easier to sell swill that way.

Why do you think they and the mediabots, hand-in-hand, are working so hard to disengage as many voters as they can this go-around?


3 posted on 05/14/2008 6:19:31 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Actually, this is very, very funny as the world is upside down and McCain and Obama are both doing all they can to Lose the Election.

Or McCain is simply telling Conservatives to go Pound Sand.


4 posted on 05/14/2008 6:20:26 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Dear Mr. McCain, I, too, am for the environment. However, I am at least smart enough to know when I am getting a snow job. Global Warming, Global Cooling, all of it is OUT OF OUR HANDS. Only a stupid ninny would fall for that clap-trap.


5 posted on 05/14/2008 6:20:44 PM PDT by irishtenor (Check out my blog at http://boompa53.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

What a pathetic lot of fools. - Thanks for the update, John.


7 posted on 05/14/2008 6:23:35 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Somebody needs to tell John that we are all pro environment, none of us have death wishes, but we are not all rubes.

Like McCain.

8 posted on 05/14/2008 6:23:49 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
There isn't a conservative in the Republican party who isn't an environmentalist. Even before John Sidney McCain discovered the term.

But we're supposed to believe his BS because he isn't really a conservative...

9 posted on 05/14/2008 6:25:11 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Me on the other hand, I’m against the environment. Down with clean water and clean air!


10 posted on 05/14/2008 6:25:16 PM PDT by BufordP (Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh Good lord, next thing we will hear is that Juan was into Gorebal warming before lard butt Al.

This guy wants to lose in a blaze of liberal fire.

Juan McCain, the guy that made liberalism cool before it was cool.


11 posted on 05/14/2008 6:27:24 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; calcowgirl; xcamel

“”He also said the Democrats’ plan to auction greenhouse gas emission permits - rather than giving them away, as he proposes - would lead to higher prices for consumers.””

LOL. Both plans are going to increase prices, and benefit the candidates Wall Street puppet masters.


12 posted on 05/14/2008 6:27:42 PM PDT by Shermy (Nightmares From My Pastor, A Story of Race and Insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Wow, I've never been more pessimistic about our future. No drilling in Anwar or the North Atlantic, protected polar bears, a disgusting bloated farm bill, McCain out-liberaling liberals, Obamanation on the rise, Israel on it's way out, Islam on the march, gas prices on the rise, open borders and amnesty on the horizon...

Our once mighty nation will be a third world country in ten years if this keeps up.

14 posted on 05/14/2008 6:28:01 PM PDT by ParaVet93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Would it be too much to ask that McCain get elected and then keel over and croak of a heart attack ASAP?


16 posted on 05/14/2008 6:30:40 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Also, he was country when country wasn’t cool.


18 posted on 05/14/2008 6:33:17 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl (McCain calls it "radical islamic terrorism," the dems don't refer to it at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

mcbush will never go

far enough to please the likes

of al gore and sean penn.


19 posted on 05/14/2008 6:34:17 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
McCain proposes to cut greenhouse gas emissions 60 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Obama and Clinton have committed to an 80 percent cut in emissions by 2050, a level favored by many scientists.

Even, round numbers such as these are obviously pulled from deep within one's buttocal cavern. Anyone who advocates them should have to describe the precise results to the climate from the proposed reductions and describe the basis whereby the percentages originated. Those proposing the numbers should be laughed about in all settings.

22 posted on 05/14/2008 6:36:52 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I just can’t vote for this wacko. He wants this country to die.


24 posted on 05/14/2008 6:37:53 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh, shut up, Juan.


25 posted on 05/14/2008 6:38:02 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

McNuts needs to take Algore Bearmanpig for VeeeP and the ticket would be perfect (can’t get any more stooopidiest)!


29 posted on 05/14/2008 6:43:06 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
November 2003: "...We were nervous as hell," said Kevin Curtis, vice president of National Environmental Trust, describing the sentiment leading up to last Thursday's Senate vote that defeated the McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act, 43 to 55. "But it's a great start. This may seem to be a defeat now, but in the end, it's a victory."

The victory lies in the gamesmanship surrounding the landmark bill, which was the first serious congressional attempt to rein in global warming. Three weeks ago, the bill reportedly had only 32 votes firmly in support of it; more than a dozen senators were on the fence. "Our fear was that if the bill pulled in fewer than 40 votes, we'd have screwed ourselves," said Curtis. "But a majority of the undecided senators broke in favor of McCain-Lieberman."

"Translation: Even though the Senate didn't pass the Climate Stewardship Act, which would cap carbon dioxide emissions from industries and create an emissions-trading system, the votes that the bill did attract sent a resounding message to the political machine. "The magic number in the current political climate is 40," said Curtis: A bill that gets at least 40 votes has a fair chance of passing if it's reintroduced, but a bill that gets fewer than 40 is as good as doomed for the foreseeable future...

Source: HERE. Note that Barack was not in the Senate yet and Hillary did sponsor this bill. Further this was the first climate bill--2003--considered by Congress. A great deal of the McCain Bashing lacks any factual basis.

32 posted on 05/14/2008 6:45:50 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"People will trust my stewardship not only because of my background and knowledge, but also my vision for the future,"

John, you're making my deceased father puke in his coffin.........I don't trust your stewardship, I don't give a rip about your background and I certainly fear your vision of the future.

Just keep it up jerk, by mid July you'll either have me voting libertarian or stayin home on election day just to say "screw you!"

33 posted on 05/14/2008 6:46:42 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Bill & Hillary Clinton are the human equivalent of the herpes virus.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson