Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K
I know too many people who smoke who HAVE NOT gotten cancer to have faith in the reports anymore. There is a population of people who never smoked who get lung cancer- can we conclude that NOT smoking causes cancer? Of course not.

Not to be pro or anti smoking but the logic is every loose.

"I know too many people who have been in combat in their 20's and 30's who HAVE NOT died to have faith in the reports anymore.

There is a population of people who never been in combat who have died in their 20's and 30's - can we conclude that NOT going into combat causes death? Of course not."

Does going into combat increase the premature death rate of the population that goes into combat?

Yes.

Does smoking increase the premature death rate of the population that smokes?

Yes.

Am I going to tell people that they cannot risk their lives if they want to?

No.

17 posted on 05/14/2008 11:18:34 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Polybius

Thanks for the reply, and I do see your point.

Has anyone ever heard figures about the number of people who DO NOT smoke who get lung cancer?

It would be an intersting statistic


45 posted on 05/16/2008 7:47:08 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson