And this is outrageous because the laws are mixed regarding whether homosexuality is a civil rights issue. I hear the gay activists say that we need federal civil rights legislation in this area because the laws are muddled and unclear.
So, if the laws as of now aren’t clear cut, she has every right to say it’s questionable regarding civil rights protections for homosexuality. I know that is a politically INCORRECT point of view.
Or, then I wonder, why are the gay activists pushing so hard for civil rights legislation if it’s already a settled matter in the law???????
It sure sounds like she was fired for violating political correctness.
She has the right to say it whether the laws are clear cut or not. The constitution doesn't say we can't speak out against laws, or question their legality!
Her point was too close for comfort.
” I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be black”. That is heresy to the homos who argue that they are “born that way”.
The key here is one day did Crystal Dixon say “I think, I want to be black”. Yet the homo has to decide whether he is going to engage in a particular behavior. There is a moment of “truth” where one chooses to proceed, or not.
Part V. Excellence, Focus and Innovation: Strive, individually and collectively, to achieve the highest level of focus, quality and pride in all endeavors; continuously improve operations; engage in reflective planning and innovative risk-taking in an environmentScratch academic freedom from the University of Toledo Mission Statement.of academic freedom and responsibility;