You know, there is no evidence that Peerot made the difference in 1992. Studies have shown that in a two-way race, his voters split about evenly between the other two — if forced to make a choice.
Furthermore, there are at least two candidates for the disaffected on the left to support — Nader and McKinney. So your argument that we have to support the GOP to keep the Democrats out doesn’t hold water.
Further, as conservatives, what would McCain’s victory get us? As with previous country-club RINO Presidents, we’ll get all the rhetoric and they’ll get all the action.
This atttitude by Republicans that they own conservative votes, that somehow we’re obligated to vote for them no matter what they do is off-putting and offensive.
If Everyone who agrees with the principles of America’s Independent Party voted ofr it, it would win.
You know, the Republicans were considered unable to win either — until they did.
In Feb ‘09 just before Broom Hilda or B.O. close down FR as an enemy propaganda hate site and try to send us all to re-education camps I shall be sure to remind you and all the others of all this in the most uncivil fashion.
However, there is evidence that Perot DIDN'T make a difference in 1992. Look at the following website and see a picture that no one talks about: http://www.leinsdorf.com/perot.htm