Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain's Vice President? Mitt Romney As Running Mate
Rasmussen ^ | May 8, 2008 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 05/10/2008 6:53:39 PM PDT by Red Steel

For Mitt Romney, the suspension of his campaign at the Conservative Political Action Committee conference two days after Super Tuesday marked the beginning of a new and promising campaign. As he ended his quest for the Republican presidential nomination, he staked for himself a position as leader for the conservative future. It's a good position to be in for a potential 2012 run for the presidency. And it's a position that makes him an attractive option for John McCain's No. 2 in 2008.

In his withdrawal speech, Romney announced that "conservative principles are needed now more than ever" -- hitting the economy, the culture, and the war. One Romney adviser referred to the speech and the pullout as "a down-payment on a conservative future."

Romney's biggest value to McCain, though, comes from his experience in business. John McCain has no such experience and famously said during the New Hampshire primary that "the issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should." (He added that he owns former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan's book.) That quote will come back to haunt McCain once general-election time finally arrives.

Mitt Romney's greatest asset for McCain -- who has been in Congress for almost a quarter of a century -- is, therefore, his executive experience, most of it in the business world, most notably as vice president of Bain & Company, Inc. from 1978 to 1984, and as founder of Bain Capital, venture-capital savior of the likes of Staples, Domino's Pizza, and Sports Authority. Romney famously turned around the corrupt and broke ($379 million in debt) Salt Lake City Olympics and cleaned up a Massachusetts budget running $3 billion in the red without raising taxes. At a time when the country may be in a wartime recession, Romney emanates a confident competence (and he would do it, as veep nominee, alongside a GOP presidential nominee with a mixed tax-cutting record). Choosing Romney, then, could be as practical as politics gets. When in the voting booth, partisan preferences may pale in comparison to the attraction of a guarantee of competence in the executive.

McCain, if he chooses Romney, may be wise to give Vice President Romney more than economics in his assignment portfolio. As two-time Cabinet secretary William J. Bennett recently put it on his radio show, "McCain would do the war. Romney would do domestic." Social conservatives might hold up McCain's speech this week on the judiciary and say, great blueprint, Senator. But we don't trust you, Senator. (In fact, former Department of Justice official Mark R. Levin, another talk-show host, said just that in the wake of the judges speech: "I don't trust this guy.") Take that basically sound blueprint and give us someone we trust. Romney, who fought judicial activism on marriage in Massachusetts -- and made the issue a key part of his campaign for president -- has some credentials there.

The governor makes electoral-map sense, too. First of all, now we can agree the Mormon factor is a plus. Utah's a lock, he won the caucus there with 90 percent of the vote. But Utah's not the battleground: Michigan is. And Romney's favorite-son status there makes it a likely delivery for McCain with Romney on the ticket. (Romney's economics talk went over well there, too, you might recall.) Romney's already been to Michigan on McCain's behalf and no doubt will return. Would the Michigan effect spread to Ohio? McCain seems already to have an appreciation for Romney's electoral assets: Romney recently spoke to the Nevada state Republican convention; Romney won the Nevada caucus with 51 percent of the vote to McCain's 13 percent.

Since endorsing McCain, Romney has hit the media trail for McCain, too -- including talking to radio and TV giant Sean Hannity -- at the McCain communications shop's request.

And speaking of numbers, Romney proved to be the Republican dream of a fundraiser and money source: He ran with some $47 million of his own during primary season. On the calendar this week, Romney has a meeting set up in Houston with McCain and Romney 2008's finance chairs and co-chairs to encourage those who are holding back to give to the senator's cash-starved campaign.

Proving how deep his team-player loyalty is, Romney even skipped the White House Correspondents Dinner in Washington, D.C., to speak to the Nevada state Republican convention in April. (Full disclosure: Romney was to sit at National Review's table; NR endorsed him for president last December.) Romney will also prove himself a team player when he campaigns and raises funds for some 30 congressmen running this year, as part of his soon-to-be-announced political-action committee; the candidates Romney supports will reflect his full-spectrum conservatism (further giving conservatives confidence that he has a commitment to their movement, even if he hasn't always been a member).

One last numbers point: John McCain is a 71-year-old who looks it. At a young 61, Romney provides a vigorous safety net for those worried "what if" when they look at McCain.

Mitt Romney and John McCain, of course, would be an odd couple -- they have a past. If the Arizona senator believes what he said during their big showdown in Florida this winter, their differences may be irreconcilable. On McCain's signature issue -- "No Surrender" in Iraq -- McCain accused the former Massachusetts governor of being on the wrong side of the debate, i.e., on the side of surrender. The rap against Romney was bogus: McCain's criticism was that during a TV interview last year, Romney endorsed the idea of private timetables between the United States and Iraq. This is not inconsistent with proposals McCain himself has considered. But McCain remembers that the word "timetable" was a Beltway buzzword last year for withdrawing from Iraq. Getting out of Iraq, however, is not what Romney was talking about. One can reasonably criticize his word choice in a heated environment, but he wasn't a cut-and-runner.

Move on, in other words. Or rather, Senator McCain, remember Moveon.org -- which has endorsed Senator Obama. The general-election opponent has a way of focusing the mind. In his CPAC speech, Romney said: "I will continue to stand for conservative principles. I will fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of those things is that we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face of evil extremism." That's a message that can run with McCain.

Bottom line: Vetted outsider Mitt Romney adds to Washington-insider McCain. He's a running mate with pluses, which, most importantly, includes being a plausible president -- 294 delegates' worth of primary voters thought so, anyway. His resume speaks for itself. McCain could do worse than pick Mitt Romney -- and he's got to know that, if he wants to win in November.

Kathryn Jean Lopez is the editor of National Review Online and a nationally syndicated columnist.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; mccain; rino; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: jwb0581
But Romney’s not that conservative.

Not at all according to his record. I was willing to back him for the nominee because he was saying all the right things and had amazing business experience, which I trust more than political experience. But....him plus McCain still does not equal one true conservative.
101 posted on 05/10/2008 9:30:34 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
And Ronald Reagan was a lifelong Democrat at one point in his life. People who have finally seen the light are the most ardent in many cases. Mitt may be one of them.

You have something there...
102 posted on 05/10/2008 9:31:44 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
I think most real conservatives are already supporting him.

Has there been a poll here lately?
103 posted on 05/10/2008 9:34:53 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: South40
There are few Republicans in the senate who are more liberal than McCain. Most conservative realize that.

I'll second that.
104 posted on 05/10/2008 9:35:55 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: piasa
The GOP could run anyone- and I mean anyone- for office and do as well as with McCain - against candidates as dull as Hillary and Obama. Probably better.

McCain has me wishing Bob Dole was back....
105 posted on 05/10/2008 9:37:08 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane; All
"I am sooo tired of this election already."

Kids Election Lesson

106 posted on 05/10/2008 9:41:29 PM PDT by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

And Ronald Reagan was a lifelong Democrat at one point in his life. People who have finally seen the light are the most ardent in many cases. Mitt may be one of them.

You have something there...


When did 61 year old Romney “see the light”? It wasn’t during the Vietnam war when he was living in France, it wasn’t after Roe vs Wade when he was 27 years old, it wasn’t during the Carter years, it wasn’t during the Reagan revolution, it wasn’t during the abortion wars or the fall of the Soviet Union, in fact Romney was against Reagan, and he was pro abortion.

It wasn’t during the Gingrich revolution and the Contract with America, Romney was against the Contract with America, in fact he only gave money to Democrats from 1989 until he decided to register as a republican for the 1994 election.

Romney ran to the LEFT of Ted Kennedy, Romney helped raise money for Planned Parenthood, Romney did not “see the Light” throughout all of the Clinton years, the 2000 election did not turn him, September 11, 2001 didn’t do it, war and the 2004 election didn’t help him “see the light”.

In one of the great political coincidences of all time, Romney had a major transformation into a complete and thorough Conservative just in time to run in the current republican primary, and he spent almost $50,000,000 of his own money to convince us of that instant rebirth from lifelong anti-conservative to leader of all conservatives in only about 30 months.


107 posted on 05/10/2008 9:55:24 PM PDT by ansel12 (Unfortunately, son, we 'Utahans' sometimes have to bend the rules a little in order to hold our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If somebody of decision making stature is making a decision then I hope it is Mitt. Good looks, young, with money and somewhat conservative is better than not having any of these qualities. He is the right choice.


108 posted on 05/10/2008 9:56:38 PM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
"Nothing would please me more, than to have Mitt Romney as McCain’s VP choice."

Yes, especially if your goal is the final and complete burial of the national Republican party.

Things that make you go "hmmm...."

109 posted on 05/10/2008 9:56:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

It’s like that raging case of herpes that never quite goes away.


110 posted on 05/10/2008 9:58:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: jwb0581

Duncan Hunter is conservative and better than the whole lot of other schmucks.


111 posted on 05/10/2008 9:58:35 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

No problem, I understand some of the problems that others have with Mitt, and he wasn’t my first choice by a long shot this year but I WOULD have voted for him. I won’t for McBackstabber.


112 posted on 05/10/2008 10:04:55 PM PDT by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

btt


113 posted on 05/10/2008 10:05:00 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Romney can be trusted to be whatever you want

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

114 posted on 05/10/2008 10:06:25 PM PDT by ansel12 (Unfortunately, son, we 'Utahans' sometimes have to bend the rules a little in order to hold our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It's astonishing how many FReepers would willing line up to drink his kool-aid and jump off a cliff like lemmings for this $3 phony. The cult of Obama ain't got nothin' on the cult of Precious Willard.
115 posted on 05/10/2008 10:08:43 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
A $100,000,000 advertising campaign for an individual run over a short time can evidently work a sort of miracle.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

116 posted on 05/10/2008 10:23:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (Unfortunately, son, we 'Utahans' sometimes have to bend the rules a little in order to hold our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Mitt on the ticket is the only way I vote mccain. Huck on the ticket I vote for bambi.


117 posted on 05/10/2008 10:26:23 PM PDT by libbylu (hw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
McCain is bad enough. He doesn't need to make it worse by having an unrepentant gun grabber as his veep. That will make me less likely to vote for the ticket.
118 posted on 05/10/2008 11:34:23 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

A lot of people will be turned off if Romney is the VP, he adds a net minus to the ticket.


119 posted on 05/10/2008 11:54:01 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC

“I agree. He needs to choose Mitt. Mitt is also an economic genius...and McCain clearly is not.”

I guess that’s why Romneycare is up to its eyeballs in debt.


120 posted on 05/10/2008 11:55:43 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson